Consumers could get dinged by Trump's Part D push

Donald Trump speaking
New analysis finds that consumers pay more out of pocket for certain high-cost drug therapies under Part D than under Part B. (Gage Skidmore/CC BY-SA 2.0)

As the Trump administration begins the push to move Medicare Part B drugs into Part D, consumers could be hit with higher bills as a result. 

New research from Avalere Health finds that Medicare out-of-pocket costs vary significantly depending on the program. In 2016, the average cost to patients for Part D covered cancer therapies was $3,200, compared to $2,400 under Part B, a 33% difference. 

Richard Kane, a senior director at the consulting firm, told FierceHealthcare that the main driver between the cost difference is common use of supplemental coverage under Part B, which is limited under Part D.

Free Daily Newsletter

Like this story? Subscribe to FierceHealthcare!

The healthcare sector remains in flux as policy, regulation, technology and trends shape the market. FierceHealthcare subscribers rely on our suite of newsletters as their must-read source for the latest news, analysis and data impacting their world. Sign up today to get healthcare news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

“Any proposal or policy for shifting drugs to Part D needs to account for these differences," he added.

RELATED: CVS-Aetna, Cigna-Express Scripts mergers would lead to massive Part D consolidation

The added coverage can make a huge difference in what consumers pay. The 25% of Part D beneficiaries without supplemental coverage paid, on average, $9,700 out of pocket for cancer therapies. 

The White House's blueprint to lower drug prices includes moving more Medicare drugs into Part D, giving plan sponsors more power to negotiate with manufacturers. Trump's plan would also allow plans to adjust their formularies to address a price increase for a sole source generic drug. 

Kane warned that any proposed shifts in high-cost drug therapies from Part B to Part D should be studied carefully, as costs would not be uniform for all patients. 

RELATED: More Medicare Part D beneficiaries reaching catastrophic phase, likely setting up calls for reform

The administration's drug pricing initiative is still in its early stages, and Kane said the White House has opportunities to work out the kinks.

"The White House has talked about possibly doing this as a demonstration program, which would shine a light on who's affected by these suggested shifts in coverage," he added. 

Suggested Articles

Physician groups slammed a court ruling that overturns CMS' site-neutral payments rule for clinic visits.

Sixteen medical professionals, including six doctors and seven pharmacists, were among those charged in a Texas healthcare fraud and opioid takedown.

Blue Shield of California is piloting transportation benefits with some of its members in Sacramento.