Oregon VA hospital administrators cherry-pick patients to improve quality metrics, clinicians say 

VA logo
The VA health system has been under scrutiny since a nationwide scandal erupted in 2014 over long wait times for care at its facilities.

Clinicians at an Oregon VA hospital say that administrators cherry-pick patients for admissions to manipulate care-quality scores, according to a new report. 

The New York Times interviewed a number of staffers at Roseburg Veterans Administration Medical Center and found through those conversations and a review of documents that the hospital began to cherry-pick patients in 2016, and since then its star rating has increased from one to two stars. 

By choosing to transfer the sickest patients to other local facilities or not admit them at all, the hospital was able to boost metrics and leadership bonuses at the expense of patient safety, a group of physicians said in a letter sent to a correspondent at the NYT.  

Clinicians currently on staff told the publication that the improved scores cover up issues like massive turnover in primary care that can endanger patients. 

RELATED: VA secretary issues blunt assessment of care for veterans 

The VA released its 2017 star ratings in late October, and the data suggests that few of its one-star hospitals have made significant improvements. Fourteen facilities earned a one-star rating last year, and the majority also did in 2016. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs' health system has also been under intense scrutiny over the past several years following a nationwide scandal in 2014, which revealed that some veterans faced extremely long waits for care. Since then, it's been reported that for more than 15 years, VA hospitals hired doctors with revoked licenses and that a number of medical centers have failed to report potentially dangerous clinicians. 

RELATED: Another VA scandal revealed—USA Today uncovers years of hidden medical mistakes, staff misconduct 

Administrators at Roseburg disputed the clinicians' accounts. Director Doug Paxton told the newspaper that it was not turning away certain patients to boost its quality metrics, but did admit that the hospital was being more selective with admissions. 

"The numbers are indicators of the quality of care for veterans, so, sure, we're worried about the numbers," Paxton said. "But if you improve the care to veterans, in turn your numbers are going to improve. That's the bottom line."

Suggested Articles

Hospitals are already signaling a legal challenge to a final rule from CMS on price transparency, but the agency is ready.

Aleksandr Pikus, 44, of Brooklyn, was found guilty of one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering and two counts of money laundering.

CMS issued a proposed rule and a final rule aimed at increasing price transparency from hospitals and insurers.