Battling superbugs requires buy-in from across the healthcare system, experts say

A diverse set of stakeholders has to be involved to truly stop the spread of superbugs, experts say. (Pixabay)

Addressing antibiotic resistance and the dearth of new drugs in development is a global concern, and the issue will require buy-in from stakeholders across the healthcare industry, experts say. 

The National Institute for Health Care Management hosted a web event Wednesday that brought together representatives from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, health policy experts, insurers and journalists to build a complete spectrum of ways the health system can take on the threat of superbugs.

It begins with better education, the experts said. Rick Young, a producer for PBS Frontline who spearheaded a series for the publication on drug resistance, said hospitals that step up and acknowledge the issue are doing a significant community service. 


13th Partnering with ACOS & IDNS Summit

This two-day summit taking place on June 10–11, 2019, offers a unique opportunity to have invaluable face-to-face time with key executives from various ACOs and IDNs from the entire nation – totaling over 3.5 million patients served in 2018. Exclusively at this summit, attendees are provided with inside information and data from case studies on how to structure an ACO/IDN pitch, allowing them to gain the tools to position their organization as a “strategic partner” to ACOs and IDNs, rather than a merely a “vendor.”

"It's a bit of a mind shift from seeing it as a marketing problem to seeing it as opposed to the medical emergency that it is—and that the public needs to see," Young said. 

RELATED: Words matter—Public health experts call for clear language and less rhetoric about superbugs 

Antibiotic-resistant superbugs are an expensive problem—with costs topping $2 billion per year based on some estimates—and deadly, on track to kill more people than cancer by 2050.  

A recent report from the CDC identified 221 "nightmare" bacteria with what the agency described as "unusual" resistance. Those germs cannot be killed by any or most antibiotics, are uncommon in certain geographic regions or the U.S. as a whole, or can spread resistance to other bugs. 

Another concern: Fee-for-service payment models for drugs are not driving the innovation needed to reduce the spread of these resistant pathogens, the experts said. But a value-based approach may be key. 

The Margolis Center on Health Policy at Duke University, for example, has developed an alternative payment model designed to incentivize antibiotic development and stewardship among providers. 

RELATED: Superbugs flourish, pass on drug resistance in hospital wastewater systems, NIH study finds 

The model—called the Priority Antimicrobial Value and Entry (PAVE) Award—would offer rewards to drugmakers who enter the market with new antibiotics, while also pushing them to enter value-based purchasing contracts. 

Monika Schneider, Ph.D., a research associate at Duke-Margolis, said at the web event that economic approaches to reducing the impact of superbugs require a mix of incentives to be effective. Antibiotic development in particular has a very low return on investment, she said, which can prevent crucial research. 

"Clinical development can be very costly," Schneider said. 

RELATED: 12 superbugs that pose the greatest danger to human health 

The World Health Organization has warned that the world is running out of effective antibiotics. Of the more than 50 medications currently in development, just eight are innovative therapies and not modifications of existing drugs, according to the global health group. 

Enhanced research and development can also drive more appropriate use and prescribing habits, Schneider said, and antibiotic stewardship is viewed as a key solution to slowing the spread of resistant bugs. 

Suggested Articles

A federal judge in Pennsylvania has tossed UPMC’s class action suit against the state’s attorney general.

Seema Verma said Thursday that while the Trump administration has focused on voluntary payment models to date, that is likely to change. 

As doctors welcome the CDC’s clarification of its opioid guideline, the authors of that guideline say medical professionals had misapplied the recommendations.