Google DeepMind, NHS partnership violated patient privacy

Google HQ building
British regulators say privacy violations in a partnership between Google and NHS were "avoidable."

A landmark partnership between the National Health Service and Google’s artificial intelligence software violated patient privacy laws, according to British regulators.

An investigation by the Information Commissioner’s Office indicated the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust failed to comply with the country’s Data Protection Act when it handed over personal data for 1.6 million patients to Google DeepMind in a five-year partnership officially announced last November.

The partnership was initially reported by New Scientist in April 2016 and immediately drew the ire of privacy experts.

RELATED: Google DeepMind, NHS partnership sparks privacy fears

While acknowledging the “huge potential” for health data on patient care, Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham said the partnership shared data in ways that patients would not have reasonably expected, and that NHS “should have been far more transparent with patients as to what was happening.”

In a blog post, Denham offered several key privacy takeaways for the rest of the healthcare sector that may be engaging in similar partnerships, advocating for the industry to adequately address privacy concerns before diving into new data sharing partnerships.

RELATED: Academic medical centers team up with Google to bolster machine learning and predictive analytics

“What stood out to me on looking through the results of the investigation is that the shortcomings we found were avoidable,” she wrote. “The price of innovation didn’t need to be the erosion of legally ensured fundamental privacy rights. I’ve every confidence the Trust can comply with the changes we’ve asked for and still continue its valuable work.

Meanwhile, a report issued by DeepMind’s independent review panel noted a lack of clarity in the initial information sharing agreement with NHS, but indicated those issues have been corrected. The panel also commended the company for implementing independent oversight—which it argued should set a standard for the industry—and noted that DeepMind Health has set a “firm policy” that future information sharing contracts will be published publicly without redactions.

Suggested Articles

The DOJ alleges the agreement would raise the likelihood of coordination and reduce their incentives to compete aggressively against each other.

Ginger banked a $50 million funding round backed by the venture arms of Cigna and Kaiser Permanente. Here's how it plans to use the financing.

The proposed change was tucked into a proposed payment rule released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on Monday.