Statins are one of the most commonly prescribed drugs. This study suggests doctors rethink their use

Doctor with patient
Shared decision-making may be the way to decide if a patient should take statins, doctors say in an editorial. (Getty/wutwhanfoto)

A new study suggests that doctors may be prescribing statins—one of the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide—to too many of their patients.

In the study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, researchers from the University of Zurich in Switzerland used a computer model to examine the benefits and harms of the cholesterol-lowering drugs. They found that statins may be overprescribed for the primary prevention of heart disease. That's because potential risks seem to outweigh the benefit for people whose 10-year cardiovascular disease risk is 7.5% to 10%—which is what the guidelines currently recommend.

The researchers said that prescribing for only those patients at higher risk thresholds would mean that millions of people would no longer be eligible for statin therapy. The study suggests that 15% to 20% of older adults should take statins—far less than the 30% to 40% of older adults who now fall within suggested medical guidelines. The researchers also said doctors should consider different recommendations based on sex, age group and statin type.

Conference

13th Partnering with ACOS & IDNS Summit

This two-day summit taking place on June 10–11, 2019, offers a unique opportunity to have invaluable face-to-face time with key executives from various ACOs and IDNs from the entire nation – totaling over 3.5 million patients served in 2018. Exclusively at this summit, attendees are provided with inside information and data from case studies on how to structure an ACO/IDN pitch, allowing them to gain the tools to position their organization as a “strategic partner” to ACOs and IDNs, rather than a merely a “vendor.”

The study said it looked at risks not adequately considered in the medical guidelines.

"Some harms are mentioned, but it's entirely unclear how they were considered when coming up with the recommendations. In our approach we very explicitly considered the harms,” Milo A. Puhan, M.D., senior author of the study, told NPR. He cautioned there isn’t a one-size-fits all decision about statins.

The Swiss researchers evaluated the 10-year cardiovascular disease risk threshold at which the benefits of statins outweighed the harms, creating separate estimates for men and women in various age groups. They consistently found the harms—such as myopathy, liver dysfunction and diabetes—exceeded the benefits until the risk thresholds were substantially higher than recommended by current guidelines. For instance, among men age 70 to 75 with no prior cardiovascular disease events, benefits did not outweigh harms until the 10-year risk was above 21%.

Doctors may also want to consider what kind of statins they prescribe. The researchers found some statins were more effective, saying atorvastatin and rosuvastatin provided more benefit at lower risks than simvastatin and pravastatin.

So with studies leading to different conclusions about the appropriate point to begin a patient on statins, which recommendation is correct? Two doctors tackled that question in an accompanying editorial.

“Perhaps only the patient can say,” wrote Ilana B. Richman, M.D., and Joseph S. Ross, of the Yale University School of Medicine.

For instance: Is the patient willing to take a daily pill? Do patients favor a risk-averse approach in which potential harms are given greater weight than potential benefits or vice versa?

“The onus is on physicians to fairly summarize the evidence and guide patients through the decision-making process,” the two doctors wrote. This study can back up that decision-making as they talk about the pros and cons of treatment.

Suggested Articles

The FTC is suing health IT company Surescripts, accusing the company of employing illegal vertical and horizontal restraints in order to maintain its…

Amid last week’s opioid prescriber crackdown, the Justice Department coordinated with local agencies to deploy health workers to help pain patients.

A wearable device that uses AI to remotely track and analyze vital signs while worn by patients at home has been cleared by the FDA.