Federal judge rules in favor of AMA lawsuit, says he will block Trump restriction on abortion clinic funding

social determinants
A federal judge said on Tuesday that he will issue a preliminary injunction to block a rule that would limit what physicians could say to Title X patients about family planning decisions. (noipornpan/GettyImages)

A federal judge in Oregon said on April 23 that he would grant a preliminary injunction to block the Trump administration from withholding Title X funding from family planning organizations offering abortion services.

U.S. District Judge Michael J. McShane indicated late Tuesday night he would issue a formal opinion soon, after he held a hearing on a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the American Medical Association and Planned Parenthood and another filed by a coalition of 20 states, according to an AMA report.  

The AMA filed the lawsuit in early March, saying the rule by the Trump administration that would revise regulations around the Title X program to block funding to groups that provide abortion referrals would interfere with the patient-physician relationship. The rule was set to take effect on May 3.

Free Daily Newsletter

Like this story? Subscribe to FierceHealthcare!

The healthcare sector remains in flux as policy, regulation, technology and trends shape the market. FierceHealthcare subscribers rely on our suite of newsletters as their must-read source for the latest news, analysis and data impacting their world. Sign up today to get healthcare news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

“Judge McShane got it exactly right when he called the new Title X rule a ‘ham-fisted’ approach to healthcare. The judge repeatedly asked how the new gag rule would improve health outcomes. The government was unable to answer,” AMA president Barbara L. McAneny, M.D., said in an emailed statement.

“The new rule would have placed obstacles to healthcare for low-income patients. We are pleased the judge shared the AMA’s concern about the physician-patient relationship that the rule would have jeopardized,” she said.

RELATED: Trump administration releases Title X rule restricting abortion clinic funding

The AMA, the country’s largest physician organization, said the Title X rule would have placed a “gag rule” on doctors dictating what they can say to patients in the Title X program about family planning.

It’s not clear whether the preliminary injunction would apply nationwide or only in the states that had joined in the lawsuit. The rule would strip funding from any participating family planning organization that offers abortions or refers patients to abortion providers.

“This is a victory for patients and doctors in this country,” said Leana Wen, M.D., president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, in a statement.

However, Wen said the relief is preliminary and vowed to continue to fight the Trump administration “in court and in Congress to ensure our patients’ health and rights are protected.”

Suggested Articles

Consumers could have saved billions in 2017 if price variation for certain services was addressed, according to a new report. 

Officials announced on Friday a proposal to remove healthcare protections for transgender patients and women seeking to terminate pregnancies.

Proposed federal rules don't go far enough to give patients and providers control when it comes to exchanging and accessing health data, AMIA says.