Doctor groups upbeat about proposed 2018 MACRA changes

Groups representing doctors and hospitals weigh in on a proposed MACRA update. (Photo by jansucko/iStock/Getty Images Plus/Getty Images)

Healthcare organizations were mostly upbeat about proposed payment rule changes that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released yesterday.

The groups agree that CMS listened to doctors' concerns in drafting proposed changes to the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) for 2018—the second year of the program—designed to make it easier for small, independent and rural practices to participate. It also increases flexibility and reduces the burden on doctors and other clinicians by simplifying reporting requirements.

RELATED: CMS releases updated proposed rule for MACRA, eases burden on small and rural practices


2019 Drug Pricing and Reimbursement Stakeholder Summit

Given federal and state pricing requirements arising, press releases from industry leading pharma companies, and the new Drug Transparency Act, it is important to stay ahead of news headlines and anticipated requirements in order to hit company profit targets, maintain value to patients and promote strong, multi-beneficial relationships with manufacturers, providers, payers, and all other stakeholders within the pricing landscape. This conference will provide a platform to encourage a dialogue among such stakeholders in the pricing and reimbursement space so that they can receive a current state of the union regarding regulatory changes while providing actionable insights in anticipation of the future.

Clinicians participate in MACRA under two tracks: Advanced Alternative Payment Models or the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS).

The initial reaction to the proposed rule from at least four healthcare groups was positive and indicated CMS had heard the pain points from the country's physicians.

Anders Gilberg, senior vice president for government affairs at the Medical Group Management Association, called the changes “a win” for the organization in a Twitter post. He said the rule delays implementation of rigid 2015 electronic health record requirements, keeps the cost component for MIPS at zero percent and expands the low volume threshold that exempts practices with a small number of Medicare patients from the program.

American Medical Association President David O. Barbe, M.D., said CMS heard the concerns of practicing physicians in providing more flexibility and proposing a number of policies to help them avoid penalties under the program.

“Not all physicians and their practices were ready to make the leap, and many faced daunting challenges. This flexible approach will give physicians more options to participate in MACRA and takes into consideration the diversity of medical practices throughout the country,” Barbe said in an announcement.

The American Hospital Association also landed in the pro column.

"Today's proposed rule continues the incremental, flexible implementation approach called for by hospitals, health systems and the more than 500,000 employed and contracted physicians with whom they partner to deliver care," Executive Vice President Tom Nickels said in a statement.

Premier healthcare alliance, one of 10 provider associations that earlier this month called for the government to modify regulations to count Medicare Advantage to qualify under MACRA as early as 2019, said it was encouraged CMS was seeking comment on that proposal and pleased CMS was allowing individual clinicians to join virtual groups as a new channel to participate in MIPS.

RELATED: More providers urge the government to count Medicare Advantage under MACRA

But not everyone was happy with the plan to slow MACRA implementation.

The AMGA said it recognizes the burden MACRA places on small practices and appreciates the options for them to participate, but is concerned about the delay in the transition to value-based care and the investment its members have made to prepare for the change.

“If CMS wants to transition to value-based payment for care, the program needs to be fully implemented,” said Chester A. Speed, vice president, public policy, in a statement. “We recommend that CMS revise its proposal to fully incentivize high performers in the Medicare program.”

Groups have until August 18 to comment on the proposed rule before CMS finalizes it.

Suggested Articles

Health insurers’ financial performance is on a continuing upward trend, but political and legal risks could pose a threat to that growth.

Senate lawmakers released a draft package of legislation Thursday aimed at curbing health care costs they said they believe they can pass on a bipartisan basis…

Attorneys general seeking to defend the ACA argue that their opponents—including the DOJ—have poor legal standing to challenge the law.