Amid a national immigration battle, fewer international doctors seek U.S. jobs

airport immigration kiosk
A healthcare recruiting firm placed fewer international physicians in 2017. (Getty/Wittayayut)

In the middle of the ongoing debate over immigration, worries continue about the impact on the healthcare industry, which depends on foreign doctors and medical students.

Now there's new evidence that fewer international doctors are seeking work in the U.S., although it's not clear whether the Trump administration's less welcoming immigration polices are to blame.

National healthcare recruiting company The Medicus Firm said it placed the lowest percentage of internationally trained physicians in 2017 in at least seven years. The percentage of internationally trained physicians placed by Medicus dropped to 24%, down seven points from nearly 32% in 2016, according to the report.

Conference

13th Partnering with ACOS & IDNS Summit

This two-day summit taking place on June 10–11, 2019, offers a unique opportunity to have invaluable face-to-face time with key executives from various ACOs and IDNs from the entire nation – totaling over 3.5 million patients served in 2018. Exclusively at this summit, attendees are provided with inside information and data from case studies on how to structure an ACO/IDN pitch, allowing them to gain the tools to position their organization as a “strategic partner” to ACOs and IDNs, rather than a merely a “vendor.”

RELATED: In the middle of an immigration debate, healthcare organizations face real-world impact

“The reason behind this trend is unclear, especially since the physician workforce demographics have not changed as such,” according to the report, which is based on the company’s 2017 placements at more than 250 hospitals and healthcare employers in 42 states.

The report also found that 6.3% of providers placed in 2017 were on either a J1 or H1-B visa, which is how most foreign-born medical graduates and medical students come to the U.S. Those visitors’ visas were subject to a travel ban imposed by President Donald Trump last year.

That travel ban and stricter immigration policies have raised fears from the medical community of the detrimental impact on the healthcare system, especially since foreign doctors and medical students often provide care in rural and underserved areas.

A federal appeals court ruled (PDF) against the latest version of Trump’s travel ban last Thursday, saying it “continues to exhibit a primarily religious anti-Muslim objective.” The revised ban placed varying levels of restrictions on foreign nationals from eight countries: Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, Somalia and Yemen.

RELATED: Future of ‘dreamer’ doctors in jeopardy as Trump rescinds DACA status; medical community ‘dismayed’ by the decision

The 2017 drop was the largest since 2014, when placements of internationally trained physicians dropped from 39% to 31%, according to Medicus. Despite the fluctuation, even at the lower 2017 rate, the overall percentage of internationally trained doctors is still relatively in line with the proportion of internationally trained physicians in the workforce, the report said.

The report also showed a decline prior to the controversy over immigration policies. In 2012 more than 42% of placements were made up of international medical graduates, which dropped to 39% in 2013, 31% in 2014 and almost 29% in 2015, before increasing to almost 32% in 2016 and then taking the dip in 2017.

Internationally trained physicians make up about 25% of the physician workforce, according to trade groups, including The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). That figure includes all physicians who graduated from a medical school outside of the U.S., whether they are American-born or foreign-born.

“International medical graduates are a vital component of the physician workforce in the U.S., particularly in light of projected physician shortages through 2025,” the report stated. 

No resolution on DACA

Another immigration issue that has raised worries among healthcare organizations is the fate of healthcare workers and students protected by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Four separate votes on four different immigration plans aimed at making DACA permanent failed in the Senate last week.

The AAMC called Congress’ failure to act to protect the so-called ‘Dreamers’ disheartening and called on Congress and the administration to come together in bipartisan action to provide stability to those with DACA status.

RELATED: Doctors’ groups urge Congress to act on DACA to protect healthcare workers and students

“As college students look toward medical school, and medical students prepare for their residency training, unless Congress acts, those with DACA status could be prevented from completing the necessary requirements to fulfill their lifelong goal of pursuing medicine or science," AAMC’s president and CEO Darrell G. Kirch said in an announcement.

"At the same time, patients in underserved communities could be denied the care they deserve since Dreamers are more likely to practice in those areas,” he addded

Without legislators' intervention, recipients will lose their protected status on March 5; the Trump administration provided a six-month grace period after announcing plans to end DACA last September.

Suggested Articles

An artificial intelligence tool can help diagnose post-traumatic stress disorder in veterans by analyzing their voices, a new study found.

The country will see a shortage of up to nearly 122,000 physicians by 2032, according to a report from the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Dr. Asaf Bitton has been tapped as the executive director at Ariadne Labs.