Families who are covered through TRICARE report worse access to healthcare than people with private plans—and even the uninsured, according to a new study.
Researchers led by a team at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) analyzed a sample of nearly 85,000 children to see how different coverage groups rated their access to care and the quality of the care they received, according to a study published in the latest issue of Health Affairs.
Those with TRICARE reported similar access and outcomes compared with those who are covered by other public plans, according to the study. For example, about 34% of those enrolled in TRICARE described care as “accessible,” compared to about 51% of those with private coverage and close to 37% of those who were uninsured.
“Overall, families covered by TRICARE face greater challenges in access to the care they received compared to non-military persons,” Roopa Seshadri, M.D., a research scientist at CHOP’s PolicyLab and the study’s lead author, told FierceHealthcare.
In addition, about 47% of those on TRICARE described their care as responsive, compared to about 52% of the commercially insured and about 51% of the uninsured.
The results were starker among families with a child that has special healthcare needs, which were common in the TRICARE population, Seshadri said. These families may struggle to access needed specialty or behavioral healthcare services to meet those needs.
Several factors are at play that can contribute to challenges faced by military families, according to the study. For one, these families move frequently, which can disrupt care and require regular switching between providers.
Military bases are also often located in remote areas that may make it harder for these families to reach the care they need—especially in the case of specialty care, according to the study.
The researchers hope that the findings lead to additional consideration about how the military could most effectively ensure families that need it have access to pediatric care and other specialty services, Seshadri said.
Solutions that could be considered, according to the study, include reducing the administrative steps needed to allow families to seek care off-base, more effectively monitoring how resources within military medical facilities are deployed and identifying where there are the most notable geographic access gaps.
“The purpose of this paper is really to highlight where there is a need and hope that those who are in a position to act upon and make the changes dive more into this area,” Seshadri said.