AHIP wants more guardrails for third-party premium payments to prevent patient steering

Health insurance forms
AHIP wants more rules around third-party payments, but new research suggests premium assistance could reduce uncompensated care costs. (Getty/vinnstock)

Citing instances of patient steering, America’s Health Insurance Plans is calling on the federal government to put up guardrails to prevent inappropriate or financially motivated third-party premium payments.

Other researchers, however, argue the program that allows organizations to absorb premium costs for low-income patients helps stabilize the market while bringing down the uninsured rate.

It’s the latest in what has emerged as a somewhat divisive federal policy created under the Affordable Care Act that allows certain organizations to provide premium assistance for exchange plans. Although the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has issued an interim final rule outlining the circumstances in which third parties can provide assistance, ongoing litigation has held up implementation.

New White Paper

Fuel Top Line Growth Across All Lines of Business

Read the latest white paper on how health plans can empower brokers, sales, and marketing teams to increase acquisition and retention rates to achieve their 2020 revenue goals.

In a new brief, AHIP argues that the third-party payment program has led to higher premiums within exchange plans because organizations are steering patients to the individual market.

RELATED: Congress wants HHS to roll back rule that bars charities from helping patients pay premiums

“It is critical to have guardrails in place to ensure that payments made by third-party entities are truly in the best interests of the patient, are not motivated by financial gain for the provider, and do not result in market destabilization,” AHIP wrote.

The group recommended that HHS prohibit direct and indirect premium payments by providers by incorporating rulemaking into Medicare and Medicaid Conditions of Participation. AHIP added that there should be clear guidelines about how a third party can market premium assistance, and those organizations should be required to report information to HHS to improve transparency.

RELATED: Insurance groups, American Kidney Fund clash over dialysis patient-steering accusations

Insurers have raised particular concerns about dialysis providers funneling payments through the American Kidney Fund in order to steer end-stage renal patients to commercial plans that reimburse at a higher rate than government plans. UnitedHealthcare has also sued American Renal Associates, claiming the provider paid premiums through the AKF.

The AKF has said insurers are guilty of steering patients toward government plans. Meanwhile, lawmakers have accused insurers of discriminating against people with chronic diseases by rejecting consumers that receive assistance from charity groups.

AHIP's concerns appear to go beyond dialysis coverage. The group says "issuers in the individual market have seen a rise in third-party payments" from organizations steering patients away from Medicare and Medicaid.

Amid these accusations, research released this month by the Commonwealth Fund found third-party payments that base their support on income rather than certain health conditions could improve affordability. After interviewing participants in five assistance programs in Washington state, Stan Dorn, a senior fellow with Families USA, found the program helped support more than 1,000 consumers that would have otherwise gone uninsured and helped cut down on uncompensated care costs.

"The affordability problems facing low-income consumers purchasing marketplace coverage are unlikely to be solved on a national scale without major policy changes,” Dorn wrote. “Until such changes are made, TPP programs could make a meaningful contribution.”

Suggested Articles

Here are three pressing questions that value-based care provider groups want CMS to answer on their new direct contracting payment model.

Federal regulators have listened to physicians' complaints about health IT burdens and they have some solutions.

Florida-based physician services provider Mednax announced Friday that UnitedHealthcare unilaterally cut the company out of its network.