The prices paid to U.S. hospitals by private insurers are about 2.4 times higher than the rates Medicare would have paid, according to a new Rand Corp. study.
If employers and health plans participating in the study had paid hospitals using Medicare’s payment formulas, total payments over the 2015-2017 period would have been reduced by $7 billion—a decline of more than 50%.
The study, which looked at the prices paid by private health plans to 1,600 hospitals across 25 states, also found prices varied widely between different states.
For instance, hospitals in Kentucky, Michigan, New York and Pennsylvania had average prices that were 150% to 200% of what Medicare would have paid in 2017. Meanwhile, hospitals in Colorado, Indiana, Maine, Montana, Wisconsin and Wyoming had average relative prices that were closer to 250% to 300% of what Medicare would have paid that same year.
RELATED: Study: Hospital ratings should give patients data based on what's most important to them
Researchers conducted the study by looking at claims data for more than 4 million people that came from about 50 self-insured employers, two state all-payer claims databases and records from health insurance plans that voluntarily participated. The analysis was done in collaboration between Rand and the Employers’ Forum of Indiana, an employer-led healthcare coalition.
“The widely varying prices among hospitals suggests that employers have opportunities to redesign their health plans to better align hospital prices with the value of care provided,” said Chapin White, the study’s lead author and an adjunct senior policy researcher at Rand, in a statement. “Employers can exert pressure on their health plans and hospitals to shift from current pricing system to one that is based on a multiple of Medicare or another similar benchmark.”
"Further, Medicare payment rates, which reimburse below the cost of care, should not be held as a standard benchmark for hospital prices," the AHA statement read. "Hospitals received payment of only 87 cents for every dollar spent caring for Medicare patients. Simply shifting to prices based on artificially low Medicare payment rates would strip vital resources from already strapped communities, seriously impeding access to care. Hospitals would not have the resources needed to keep our doors open, innovate to adapt to a rapidly changing field and maintain the services communities need and expect."
AHA pointed to data from the National Health Expenditure report released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in December showing price growth for hospital services was 1.7% in 2017 and a report from the Altarum Center for Value in Health Care that found hospital-spending growth in 2018 was lower than all other categories of services.
Rand researchers acknowledged limitations of the study, saying the claims data used were only available for a limited number of enrollees such as those enrolled in self-insured plans that wanted to participate and the residents of Colorado and New Hampshire who are enrolled in the two state all-payer claims databases. That makes it possible that Rand's estimates are not representative of the prices paid by the broader privately insured population.
Rand researchers recommended private insurers move away from discounted-charge contracting for hospital services and shift to contracting based on a percent of Medicare or another similar fixed-price arrangement. Legislative interventions might include placing limits on payments for out-of-network hospital care or allowing employers to buy into Medicare or another public option that pays providers based on a multiple of Medicare rates, Rand researchers said.