Economists call FTC's Evanston solution flawed

A group of eight economics professors have filed a friend-of-the-court brief arguing that the FTC's decision on Evanston (IL) Northwest Healthcare's merger simply doesn't work. The professors argue that the corporate rules created by the FTC--which require the system's newly-merged hospital to bargain for managed care contracts separately from the existing two hospitals--won't really foster competition. Since the three hospitals are all acting on behalf of parent company ENH, they still have an incentive to collude on pricing, the professors argued. (The FTC had fashioned this remedy after finding that the 2000 merger between ENH and Highland Park (IL) hospital had driven anti-competitive price increases.) The FTC currently has until Oct. 29 to respond to the plan ENH filed describing how the hospitals would conduct independent managed care negotiations.

To learn more about the debate:
- read this Modern Healthcare article

Related Articles:
FTC approves U of Pitt takeover of Catholic hospital. Report
FTC approves IPA model. Report
FTC uses leverage to step up antitrust scrutiny. Report
FTC critical of IL hospital merger, won't force sale. Report

Suggested Articles

The profit margins and management of Community Health Group raise questions about oversight of managed care insurers.

Financial experts are warning practices about the pitfalls of promoting medical credit cards to their patients.

A proposed rule issued by HHS on Tuesday would expand short-term coverage, a move Seema Verma said will have "virtually no impact" on ACA premiums.