Most physicians will face malpractice claims, but risk of making payment is low
Analysis by specialty finds that more than 75 percent will face at least 1 claim during their career
While most U.S. physicians will face a malpractice lawsuit at some time in their careers, a new study finds, the vast majority of those suits will not result in payment to a plaintiff. The report, which will appear in the August 18 New England Journal of Medicine, provides the most comprehensive analysis of the risk of malpractice claims by physician specialty in more than two decades and finds that the annual chance of a claim varies from around 5 percent in low-risk specialties to nearly 20 percent in specialties at the highest risk.
"Physicians in any specialty are generally interested in knowing how likely they are to face a malpractice claim, whether they are likely to make a payment and how large such a payment would be," says Anupam B. Jena, MD, PhD, of the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Department of Medicine, the study's lead author. "Naturally, physicians in each specialty believe they are getting sued more often than average. But while anecdotes abound, actual facts on who is getting sued and for how much have been unavailable until now. Identifying which specialties are most likely to face frequent litigation may help guide malpractice reform."
Jena and his colleagues at the Harvard Kennedy School, the Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics at the University of Southern California (USC) and the RAND Corporation analyzed claims information covering the years 1991 to 2005 from a major malpractice insurer operating in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Data collected reflected more than 230,000 physician-years of coverage involving almost 41,000 individual physicians. The investigators calculated the annual percentage of physicians in each specialty that faced a claim, distinguished claims that led to a payment - either from a court decision or an out-of-court settlement - and measured the size of those payments. They also determined which specialties faced higher or lower risks of either facing a claim or making a payment and calculated the career-long risks of facing claims for high- and low-risk specialties.
During each year of the study period, 7.4 percent of all physicians had a claim filed against them, but only 1.6 percent made a malpractice payment. Specialties with the highest risk of facing a claim were neurosurgery (19.1 percent), thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (18.9 percent) and general surgery (15.3 percent). The lowest risks were seen in family medicine (5.2 percent), pediatrics (3.1 percent) and psychiatry (2.6 percent). However, only about 20 percent of all claims actually led to a payment, and those specialties most likely to face claims were not always most likely to pay claims. The average claim payment was almost $275,000, and the cumulative career risk of facing a malpractice claim was 99 percent in the high-risk and 75 percent in low-risk specialties.
"We were surprised that the probability of facing at least one malpractice claim over the average physician's career was so high and particularly that so many claims did not result in payment," says Amitabh Chandra, PhD, professor of Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School and corresponding author of the NEJM report. "The malpractice insurance that physicians purchase does not insure them from the emotional costs of being involved in litigation. These 'hassle costs' have no social value, and given the frequency of litigation, our findings support physicians' perceptions of the inefficiency of the current malpractice system."
Adds co-author Seth Seabury, PhD, of the RAND Corporation, a nonprofit research institution, "It is a near certainty that, over a lengthy career, a physician in a high-risk specialty will be accused of malpractice, but the vast majority of these suits will be unsuccessful. Calls for system reform will persist until a way is found to promote faster, less costly resolution of these claims while maintaining fair compensation for deserving patients."
Study co-author Darius Lakdawalla, PhD, director of Research at the Schaeffer Center at USC, concludes, "In the final analysis, everyone entering the field of medicine, no matter their specialty, can be reasonably confident that they will eventually face a malpractice claim. That speaks to the pervasiveness of malpractice litigation and the hold of the legal system over the medical profession." The study was supported by grants from the RAND Institute for Civil Justice and the National Institute on Aging.
Celebrating the 200th anniversary of its founding in 1811, Massachusetts General Hospital (www.massgeneral.org) is the original and largest teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School. MGH conducts the largest hospital-based research program in the United States, with an annual research budget of nearly $700 million and major research centers in AIDS, cardiovascular research, cancer, computational and integrative biology, cutaneous biology, human genetics, medical imaging, neurodegenerative disorders, regenerative medicine, reproductive biology, systems biology, transplantation biology and photomedicine.
Harvard Kennedy School (www.hks.harvard.edu/) maintains an abiding commitment to advancing the public interest by training skilled, enlightened leaders and solving public problems through world-class scholarship and active engagement with practitioners and decision makers. The school offers the depth, reflection, insight, and excellence of ideas and teaching that can shape future leaders, affect public policies, and make an impact on people and their daily lives.
The Schaeffer Center at USC (healthpolicy.usc.edu/)is one of the leading health policy centers in the United States. Currently, the Schaeffer Center conducts research and policy analysis to support evidence-based health care reform. Studies underway focus on critical health policy issues related to health care spending and value, the impacts of public policy on pharmaceutical innovation, insurance design, the macroeconomic consequences of U.S. health care costs and comparative effectiveness and outcomes research.
The RAND Institute for Civil Justice (www.rand.org/icj.html) helps make the civil justice system more efficient and equitable by supplying government leaders, private decision-makers and the public with the results of objective, empirically based, analytic research.