The impact of Medicaid expansion on hospital closures

Rural hospitals were more likely to close in states that did not expand Medicaid, according to a new study. (Getty/juststock)

Medicaid expansion significantly decreased the number of people without insurance, and in turn may have prevented some cash-strapped hospitals from closing, according to a new study. 

Researchers from the University of Colorado School of Public Health compiled financial data on critical access hospitals reported between 2008 and 2016 and found that these facilities in states that expanded Medicaid were six times less likely (or 84% less likely) to close, according to data published in Health Affairs. 

Financial margins for these hospitals also improved by 33% in expansion states, according to the study. 


2019 Drug Pricing and Reimbursement Stakeholder Summit

Given federal and state pricing requirements arising, press releases from industry leading pharma companies, and the new Drug Transparency Act, it is important to stay ahead of news headlines and anticipated requirements in order to hit company profit targets, maintain value to patients and promote strong, multi-beneficial relationships with manufacturers, providers, payers, and all other stakeholders within the pricing landscape. This conference will provide a platform to encourage a dialogue among such stakeholders in the pricing and reimbursement space so that they can receive a current state of the union regarding regulatory changes while providing actionable insights in anticipation of the future.

RELATED: What's next for Medicaid—Experts weigh in on waivers, expansion, work requirements 

Closure rates in both groups of states were similar until diverging circa 2012, the researchers found. This could coincide with a Supreme Court decision that year that made Medicaid expansion optional. There was also a significant number of closures in nonexpansion states in 2013, according to the study, as critical access hospitals expected disproportionate share hospital payments to be phased out. 

For-profit hospitals were also more likely to close than non-profit facilities, the study found. 

The findings add to the growing body of research that suggests Medicaid expansion was a significant financial boon for hospitals. By significantly decreasing the number of low-income patients without insurance, uncompensated care spending dropped, research showed. 

RELATED: A third of rural hospitals at risk for closure; extension of federal programs could provide relief

The researchers warned that a rollback of Medicaid expansion could lead to additional rural hospital closures that could cripple access to care for patients in those areas. Increased travel time to another facility could worsen outcomes for people with critical needs, and closures would also likely mean a loss of skilled jobs in regions that need that work. 

The impacts are less pronounced in urban areas, the researchers said, as hospitals that close in those regions are typically of poorer quality. 

"In rural or smaller communities, hospital closures have a far greater impact because they not only affect the delivery of healthcare services and emergency care, but we also have to consider that these hospitals are the largest employer and often are pillars in those communities," Gregory Tung, Ph.D., an assistant professor in the School of Public Health and one of the study's authors, said in an announcement

Suggested Articles

Health insurers’ financial performance is on a continuing upward trend, but political and legal risks could pose a threat to that growth.

Senate lawmakers released a draft package of legislation aimed at curbing healthcare costs they believe they can pass on a bipartisan basis.

Attorneys general seeking to defend the ACA argue that their opponents—including the DOJ—have poor legal standing to challenge the law.