Maryland’s global budget program falls short of expectations in several key metrics

Three nurses walking down a hospital corridor
Maryland's global budget program was designed to reduce inpatient and ED care. So far, it hasn't. (Getty/VILevi)

Policymakers had high hopes for an innovative payment program in Maryland aimed at incentivizing providers to reduce costs and keep patients out of the hospital.

But recent research shows the approach hasn’t necessarily paid off.

The policy initiative known as the global budget program was rolled out to rural hospitals in Maryland in 2010. Under the model, hospitals were given an annual budget for inpatient, emergency department and outpatient services from all payers, including Medicare, Medicaid and commercial insurers.

Free Daily Newsletter

Like this story? Subscribe to FierceHealthcare!

The healthcare sector remains in flux as policy, regulation, technology and trends shape the market. FierceHealthcare subscribers rely on our suite of newsletters as their must-read source for the latest news, analysis and data impacting their world. Sign up today to get healthcare news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

The idea behind the payment model was hospitals would take more steps to avoid readmissions and keep patients out of the ED. The program was expanded to urban and suburban hospitals in 2014.

But data published in Health Affairs found no substantial change in patient populations that received care from hospitals participating in the global budget program compared to those that weren’t. Although the researchers found that metrics like inpatient admissions and 30-day readmissions declined over a three-year period, they saw similar declines in a control group that didn’t participate in the payment model.

RELATED: Maryland’s value-based care program controlled costs but didn’t necessarily improve care

The Health Affairs study adds to a similar study, led by the same group of researchers, that found the global budget program had almost no impact on hospital or primary care use. 

“There is widespread interest in moving to alternative payment models that contain healthcare spending while still ensuring robust health outcomes,” lead author, Eric Roberts, an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health told Harvard Medical School earlier this month. “Unfortunately, with the Maryland experiment, we didn’t find meaningful changes in care that policymakers had hoped this program would achieve.”

RELATED: Pennsylvania charts a path forward for rural hospitals

While some have said the ambitious Maryland initiative has helped reduce per capita spending across the state, the program doesn’t appear to be making a dent in key metrics like readmissions. But researchers say the initiative may need more time to develop. Maryland recently made changes to include physicians in the program, which could create stronger incentives to reduce hospital uses.

“By focusing incentives on hospitals while excluding physicians, Maryland’s global budget program might not have provided sufficiently strong incentives for providers to reduce hospital use,” the authors wrote in Health Affairs.

Meanwhile, Pennsylvania is planning to roll out a similar payment model for its rural health providers through a program that will receive $25 million from the federal government over the next five years.

Suggested Articles

CVS Health is joining forces with UPS to test several different applications for drone delivery, including sending products directly to patients.

A federal judge won't give the Trump administration more time to repay hospitals affected by $380 million in site-neutral payment cuts.

Cleveland Clinic and telehealth company American Well are launching a Cleveland-based joint venture telehealth company.