Most Popular Stories
- Walgreens plans 100 more retail clinics by mid-2009
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
Texas Hospitalist
StaffPointe, LLC - south , TX -
Arizona Intensive Care RN
StaffPointe, LLC - north , AZ -
Chief Privacy Officer, Americas Region
IMS Health Incorporated - Plymouth Meeting, PA -
Nevada Internal Medicine
StaffPointe, LLC - Las Vegas , NV -
Maryland OB/GYN CEx1157
StaffPointe, LLC - east , MD
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
- Emerging markets series: Benchmarking key countries Brazil, Russia, India, China and Turkey
Popular Topics
GA lets malpractice extension stand
Georgia's Supreme Court has rejected an appeal that would have eliminated malpractice plaintiffs' ability to sue well after they were allegedly harmed. Under current Georgia law, malpractice plaintiffs usually have two years from the date of an alleged misdiagnosis to file a suit. However, about 20 years ago, the court created an exception to that rule that lets patients file a suit when they develop a new, more serious condition, which they allege stems from a past negligent diagnosis. Under these rules, they have two years from when the new injury first appears.
Though attorneys suggest that it can only be applied to a limited number of cases, this exception is galling to doctors, who sued to overturn it. The suit included a "friend of the court" brief from the Medical Association of Georgia. However, the court let the prior precedent stand. It affirmed a prior jury verdict awarding $800,000 to a patient whose terminal metastatic colon cancer was missed in 2000, but became symptomatic again in 2004.
To learn more about this decision:
- read this AMedNews.com article
Related Articles:
Illinois med mal law faces challenge
NC doctors fight malpractice disclosure website
AMA fights to keep malpractice caps in place
Senate bill could transform medical malpractice
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





