FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FiercePharma

Tufts withdraws invitation for Grassley aide to speak

Tools
Tags
Columbia University
Charles Grassley
Tufts University
Stanford
Sheldon Krimsky
Physician Payment Sunshine Act
Paul Thacker
Helen Boucher
Harvard Medical School
conflict-of-interest

Tufts University recently withdrew an invitation for Paul D. Thacker--an investigator for Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA)--to speak about conflicts-of-interest in medicine at an upcoming conference because of the senator's current investigation of ties between a professor at the school and the drug industry. The professor, Dr. Helen Boucher, is an infectious disease specialist. 

Sheldon Krimsky, cochairman of the ethics committee and one of the conference's organizers, initially sent out an invitation to Grassley to speak, but was turned down by the senator. Then Thacker was invited on Feb. 13; on Feb. 17, Grassley sent a letter to the university asking for "detailed information on the relationship between a 'Dr. Boucher' and the pharmaceutical industry" from January 2006 through December 2008. 

Once the administration at Tufts connected the dots, Krimsky sent another email to Thacker saying that if he spoke, university administrators wouldn't be permitted to serve as panelists, "pending the University's response to the Feb. 17 letter from the Senator." Shortly thereafter, Thacker's invite was rescinded. 

Through his efforts, Grassley is trying to determine the amount of influence drug and device companies have over medical schools. He's currently investigating doctors from Harvard Medical School, Columbia University and Stanford, among other institutions. He also has sponsored the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, requiring drug and devicemakers to publicize any payments to physicians that are more than $500. 

To learn more about this incident:
- here's the Boston Globe story

Related Articles:
Drug company funding for universities under more pressure
Harvard psychiatrists fail to reveal millions in pharma pay
Stanford limiting drugmaker CME funding
Senators want info on who paid doctors

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceHealthcare Email Newsletter:
Comments (2) | Post a comment

Comments

Tufts and the rest of these schools have been silently allowing Pharma to take over their programs.

the money is just too much for them to say no to.

Tufts, Harvard, Stanford, Emory and others that were listed above are probably just the tip of the iceberg.

Schatzberg, Nemeroff, Biederman- you corporate whore bags.

these schools do not know how to handle this as their students begin to see what is actually going on.

whore= tufts, harvard, emory and more...

What about the money Grassley has received from the pharmaceutical industry and the health insurance industry over the years? Pot calling the kettle black? Is this why he is blocking single-payer healthcare reform from even being on the table—because he’s in the pockets of the industry?

According to OpenSecrets.org from 2003 – 2008 alone, Senator Grassley has taken donations from:

The Insurance Industry: $643,643

Health Professionals $812,077

Pharmaceuticals/Health Products Industry $352,222

Hospitals/Nursing Homes $288,895

Health Services/HMOs $245,416

That’s a grand total of $2,342,253.

Grassley’s 2nd highest contributor is Blue Cross / Blue Shield.

Can we trust Grassley to put aside the profits of the industries that have kept him in the senate? Will he put Americans’ necessities ahead of the profits of his contributors?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.