FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FiercePharma

Tom Pettibone: EHR implementation--are you ready for change?

Tools
Tags
technology
Stimulus Package
Obama
Medicare
Medicaid
implementation
hospitals
electronic health records
EHRs
Reader's Corner

 

The U.S. government has set an aggressive goal for the healthcare industry, ensuring every American has an electronic healthcare record by 2014. As President Obama's recovery package rolls out over the next several years, hospitals and healthcare providers must ask themselves if they are willing and prepared to implement EHR and transform their 'pencil and paper' record-keeping system into a new electronic system.

The billions of dollars allotted for healthcare IT investment and the millions offered in incentive for switching to an EHR system are certainly motivating, but some may ask, "Other than the money, what else does an EHR implementation have to offer?"

While there is talk of the general benefits EHR can bring to the operations of the healthcare system, the most important is that EHR has real life-saving potential. An EHR system allows for quick and easy access to patient records and a rapid transfer of information from physician to pharmacy.

In the event of an emergency, quick access to records can make all the difference in a life-threatening situation; real-time access to records gives paramedics the ability to quickly and confidently learn the victim's medical history and identify any pre-existing conditions or allergies to medications. Moreover, by avoiding multiple entries, hospitals can increase efficiencies and streamline operations, allowing the focus to shift from heavy clerical tasks to more mission-critical tasks.

Another important benefit to mention is the financial advantage to hospitals and healthcare institutions. The maximum amount of funds will be available to hospitals that put an EHR system into practice within the first three payout years (2011-2013), and the funds thereafter will decrease by 25 percent year over year until the funding is no longer available. So, making an early switch to EHR is financially smart and can also help hospitals avoid looming penalties in the form of decreased Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement.

Moreover, these systems keep institutions competitive in another, often overlooked, way--through talent recruitment and retention. For newly minted doctors who grew up in the Internet age, working at a technology-savvy institution with modern communications is a draw. Quite simply, the best talent wants the best tools.

All that said, carrying out an EHR transformation is a lengthy process. In fact, it takes anywhere from two to three years to complete, depending on where the organization is in the transition process. With the first stimulus payouts scheduled for 2011, beginning the transition now is critical in order to ensure the proper steps are completed in time to realize maximum fund benefits and avoid penalties.

Through a six-step process, a hospital can gauge where it stands in the transition to an EHR system and it looks something like this:

1. Assessment: The first step to a flawless transition is an assessment of the existing infrastructure and data to determine its quantity, quality and age. Patient records must be consistent throughout the hospital in order to transition to an EHR system.

2. Definition of future state: Once the initial assessment is complete, the hospital must define its future state. This definition will encompass best practices in EHR, available hardware and software, trends in EHR, and the current state of technology in the hospital. 

3. Gap Analysis: The gaps between today's environment and the future state are defined and documented. Gaps include data quality and format, hardware and software gaps, and required business process changes.

4. Strategy to "close the gap": At this point, a written strategy is developed to close the gaps by first determining an order of priorities, and then the necessary hardware, software and man power required to apply these initiatives.

5. Business Case: Once a strategic plan is in place, the next step is to build and sell a business case that includes costs, time needed for completion, long-term payback and any other advantages or disadvantages to be realized through the implementation.

6. Implementation: Lastly, the longest and most challenging step is upgrading from the current system to the electronic system, which involves installing both the technical specifications of the envisioned system as well as the business processes to enable the desired shift. This stage includes data corrections, vendor analysis, hardware and software implementation, and business process changes.

With the first of the stimulus payouts not far down the road, the quickest to the gates will draw the greatest benefit. The longer a hospital waits to begin EHR implementation, the more it will lose its competitiveness. Competitors will gain an edge from a technology standpoint and collect the maximum stimulus funds.

Tom Pettibone, founder and managing partner of Transition Partners, is an expert source on IT budget management, CIO advisory, capitalization of investment, and IT value, which is a growing concern given the current economic situation. He is a senior executive with more than 25 years of experience in Information Technology line-management and management consulting, and an expert in achieving IT turnarounds in small and large companies, aligning IT and business strategy, implementing IT for new business capability and achieving bottom-line improvement.

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceHealthcare Email Newsletter:
Comments (3) | Post a comment

Comments

All good points.

I'd even add to the step 6 challenges. The end goal of the technical and business process changes is full adoption of the system by the clinical community. An often-overlooked impediment to adoption is the responsiveness, or speed, of the deployed system. If this isn't planned for early as a goal (in step 2), users will resist the new EHR system and IT will lose momentum in the transition.

Tom,
all good advice, and I would add the importance of organizational transition planning and management is critical to the success of the implementation. To mirror your steps, I would suggest:
-Define: what is the change and who will it impact
-Align: understand the stakeholder impacts and resistance to the change. Build an engagement strategy & plan which might include organizational structure change, new performance management components & rewards, and training
-Communicate: build and execute a comprehensive communication plan to ensure awareness, understanding and commitment to the change/transition. Everyone should know "what is in it for them"
-Measure: build an adoption plan to ensure the system/process is being used as intended and achieving the intended outcomes.
There have been numerous studies that show without a well thought out and executed change strategy, the new system/process will not be fully adopted and rework ($$ and time) will occur.
Maureen Gevertz
www.maureengevertz.com

I've seen firsthand how much time and money it takes to transition to an electronic health record. The biggest impediment is that the providers don't want to become point and click data entry clerks and they think that is what EMR/EHR means. They don't realize that there are other options. Perhaps they are kept in the dark because the people who are most vocal and have the most influence are the stakeholders (EMR point and click vendors)in this mess.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.