Most Popular Stories
- Debt payments still mire HCA
- Forum: IT won't help much until practices shift operations
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
- A new strategy for harried physicians: See patients in groups
- Fitch changes not-for-profit hospital outlook to negative
- Rapid-response teams have little effect on cardiac arrest deaths
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
- A new strategy for harried physicians: See patients in groups
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
Michigan OBGYN
StaffPointe, LLC - south , MI -
California Urgent Care SLB1197tsNET
StaffPointe, LLC - south , CA -
Nevada Manager Nursing Med/Sur
StaffPointe, LLC - south , NV -
Tennessee Rheumatologist
StaffPointe, LLC - near Chattanooga , TN -
Texas Urgent Care Physician CEx1154
StaffPointe, LLC - near Sherman , TX
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
Popular Topics
SPOTLIGHT: Consumers trust web health info, but not quality data
April 28, 2008 — 6:59am ET
A new study suggests that while consumers are comfortable using the web to search for health information, they're not as comfortable with sites that provide quality data. In fact, they trust health information 80 percent of the time, but trust quality data only 40 percent of the time, according to researchers. This is partly because patients simply aren't used to reading quality data, but also because they aren't sure quality ratings are relevant to their needs, they concluded. Article
Be the first to comment
Related Stories
- Consumers Union plans to rate hospitals
- Joint Commission releases new inpatient psych measures
- CMS will pay more than $36M in quality reporting
- Health plan quality improves, while federal payers lag
- PA senators work to save PHC4
- Aetna posts pricing, quality data
- Seattle-area healthcare "checkup" finds deficiencies
- Unclear on how hospital data affects decisions
- Progress slow on hospital data in IL
- Critical-access hospitals not part of CMS quality program
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





