Most Popular Stories
- Debt payments still mire HCA
- Forum: IT won't help much until practices shift operations
- A new strategy for harried physicians: See patients in groups
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
- Fitch changes not-for-profit hospital outlook to negative
- Rapid-response teams have little effect on cardiac arrest deaths
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
- A new strategy for harried physicians: See patients in groups
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
Florida OB/GYN
StaffPointe, LLC - west , FL -
California Internal Medicine
StaffPointe, LLC - near San Diego , CA -
Wisconsin-Family Medicine
Ohrmund Employment Group - Cedarburg, WI -
CA Nursing Direct. Medical/Telemetry
StaffPointe, LLC - San Francisco , CA -
Oregon Director of Oncology Serv. CC1028hbNET
StaffPointe, LLC - near Eugene , OR
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
Popular Topics
Should practices "get tough" with insurers?
![]()

This week, as part of my coverage of the Medical Group Management Association's annual meeting, I wrote about how hard it's getting to make a profit as a medical group. In an editorial, I noted that for many types of groups (including some lucrative specialties), expenses are rising faster than revenues, something which obviously can't go on forever.
In response, a practice manager from California wrote in with this take:
"I believe that doctors have to get tough with these heartless insurance companies. I read in Physician's Practice a while back that the pediatricians told the parents that the insurance companies were not reimbursing appropriately and that they were not going to dispense vaccines until the insurance companies coughed up the money. This is the kind of hardball that physicians need to play. If we pay $10 for a vaccine I expect that we will be reimbursed properly. If we are not, the parents are sent a bill. When they return for a visit and have not paid, then we tell them that they can (a) pay what they owe or (b) re-schedule for a time that they can pay. (Our office) is not a free clinic and I do not believe that physicians should be in the business of losing money. I will NOT stand for it."
With all due respect to my correspondent, my feeling is that while groups should hold the line with insurance companies, they're not going to get much more juice out of them at this point. On the other hand, they can certainly tighten up patient collection measures--after all, you have more leverage with patients, who at least stand there and look you in the face.
Readers, do you think that groups can regain their footing financially by drawing a line in the sand with insurance companies? (I'd love to hear stories of how you won the day in battles like the one outlined above.) And OK, maybe one group doesn't have sufficient clout on its own, but if most groups pushed harder, would it work? Or are we on the verge of some major shifts toward business activities that don't involve collecting from a health plan? - Anne
Related Stories
- Congress passes bill banning genetic discrimination
- ALSO NOTED: Plavix copycat on the rise in Europe; Hospital bills for services to dead patient; and much more...
- MA physician group files suit over rankings
- SPOTLIGHT: Providers fight self-insured plans for payments
- Provena Covenant's tax exemption in jeopardy again
- CA finalizes bills boosting patient privacy
- India benefits from fertility-related medical tourism
- Have cancer drug prices topped out?
- Universities receiving kickbacks from health plans?
- Google searches for the flu
Comments
Shame on doctors for refusing to treat based on payment for services. Free clinic or not, we are in our professions to treat and care for others regardless of insurances or financial status. Perhaps it is the ridiculous cost for equipment and medications that ought to be regulated. When is enough, enough?
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





