Most Popular Stories
- Case study: NYC works to manage diabetes
- Verizon is the latest telecom to seek riches in mobile healthcare
- 20 percent of diabetics are 100 pounds overweight, study concludes
- DTC pharma ads could raise Medicaid costs
- Study: Number of HIEs going online up about 40 percent since 2008
- Alabama MDs say state Blue plan hasn't followed class-action agreement
Featured Jobs
-
Endocrinologist Job in Washington
StaffPointe, LLC - Seattle, WA -
Endocrinologist Job in Indiana
StaffPointe, LLC - Indianapolis -
Family Practitioner Job in Louisiana
StaffPointe, LLC - north, LA -
Geriatrics/Family Practice Job in Florida
StaffPointe, LLC - south , FL -
Orthopedic Surgery Job in Massachusetts
StaffPointe, LLC - west, MA
Events
- Security Audits: Is Your Organization Prepared and In Compliance?
Dec.3 at 12 pm CT - Harvard Business School 7th Healthcare Conference
January 30, 2010
Paid Research Reports
- Pricing and Reimbursement in Key Asia Pacific Markets
- Delivery Mechanisms for Large Molecule Drugs: Successes and failures of leading technologies and key drivers for market success
- The Cardiovascular Market Outlook to 2013: Competitive landscape, global market analysis and pipeline analysis
- Intellectual Property and Outsourcing in China: Minimizing risk whilst maximizing return on investment
- Health Care Equipment & Supplies: Global Industry Guide
- 2009 Trends to Watch: Healthcare Technology
FEATURES >> YouTube | Top acute-care hospitals | Women in Health IT | Top BlackBerry Apps | Commentary
TOPICS >> Stimulus | Health Reform | CMS News | Finance | EMRs | Mobile Healthcare | Hospital Leadership Blog
Free Newsletter
FierceHealthcare is the leading source of healthcare management news for healthcare industry executives. Join 50,000+ healthcare industry insiders who get FierceHealthcare via daily email. Sign up today!
Popular Topics
- Medicare
- health plans
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
- Insurance
- Electronic Medical Records (EMRs)
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Medicaid
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- healthcare system
- health reform
- prescription drugs
- pharmaceutical companies
Should practices "get tough" with insurers?
![]()

This week, as part of my coverage of the Medical Group Management Association's annual meeting, I wrote about how hard it's getting to make a profit as a medical group. In an editorial, I noted that for many types of groups (including some lucrative specialties), expenses are rising faster than revenues, something which obviously can't go on forever.
In response, a practice manager from California wrote in with this take:
"I believe that doctors have to get tough with these heartless insurance companies. I read in Physician's Practice a while back that the pediatricians told the parents that the insurance companies were not reimbursing appropriately and that they were not going to dispense vaccines until the insurance companies coughed up the money. This is the kind of hardball that physicians need to play. If we pay $10 for a vaccine I expect that we will be reimbursed properly. If we are not, the parents are sent a bill. When they return for a visit and have not paid, then we tell them that they can (a) pay what they owe or (b) re-schedule for a time that they can pay. (Our office) is not a free clinic and I do not believe that physicians should be in the business of losing money. I will NOT stand for it."
With all due respect to my correspondent, my feeling is that while groups should hold the line with insurance companies, they're not going to get much more juice out of them at this point. On the other hand, they can certainly tighten up patient collection measures--after all, you have more leverage with patients, who at least stand there and look you in the face.
Readers, do you think that groups can regain their footing financially by drawing a line in the sand with insurance companies? (I'd love to hear stories of how you won the day in battles like the one outlined above.) And OK, maybe one group doesn't have sufficient clout on its own, but if most groups pushed harder, would it work? Or are we on the verge of some major shifts toward business activities that don't involve collecting from a health plan? - Anne
Related Stories
- Generics save consumers, insurers $1 billion
- A new strategy for harried physicians: See patients in groups
- Universities receiving kickbacks from health plans?
- Personalized medicine offers hope, but not today
- CA Supreme Court rules against balance billing
- Insurers have no plans to end rescission practices
- Drugmakers offer performance-based pricing
- Flu blamed for deaths of Maryland teens
- Study: Mercury in vaccines doesn't hurt kids
- Chiropractor sues patient over negative online review
Comments
Shame on doctors for refusing to treat based on payment for services. Free clinic or not, we are in our professions to treat and care for others regardless of insurances or financial status. Perhaps it is the ridiculous cost for equipment and medications that ought to be regulated. When is enough, enough?
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site Map | List in Marketplace | Supplier MarketplaceTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2009 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





