Most Popular Stories
- Debt payments still mire HCA
- Forum: IT won't help much until practices shift operations
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
- A new strategy for harried physicians: See patients in groups
- Fitch changes not-for-profit hospital outlook to negative
- Rapid-response teams have little effect on cardiac arrest deaths
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
- A new strategy for harried physicians: See patients in groups
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
Colorado NP or PA
StaffPointe, LLC - southeast , CO -
Texas Chief Financial Officer LW1007mm
StaffPointe, LLC - Dallas , TX -
Texas Family Practice CEx1155
StaffPointe, LLC - south , TX -
Florida Medical Technologist
StaffPointe, LLC - St. Petersburg , FL -
Florida Family Practice
StaffPointe, LLC - west , FL
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
Popular Topics
Should CPOE systems be regulated?
December 13, 2005 — 8:01pm ET
In the wake of last week's much discussed report on CPOE errors in Pediatrics, some voices are wondering if there should be some form of regulation for CPOEs. Is it time for a debate on the issue? The author of the Pediatrics study comments in an interview with UPI: "Drugs or medical devices must go through some degree of inspection and evaluation to determine whether the manufacturer's claims are substantiated. There's no such process for medical software programs at the current time, and I think there needs to be."
- read this article from UPI
Related Stories
- SPOTLIGHT: Progress on comparative effectiveness program
- SPOTLIGHT: Grassley pushes for FDA reform
- FDA to monitor heart device safety
- Benefits of interfacing computers to medical devices
- FDA investigated for improper review of medical devices
- FDA's medical approval process faces GAO scrutiny
- Doctor gifts banned by WI Medical Society
- MedPAC mulls financial relationship disclosure rules
- Freud's 'Talking cure' may actually work
- Leapfrog names top hospital safety performers
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





