Most Popular Stories
- Debt payments still mire HCA
- Forum: IT won't help much until practices shift operations
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
- A new strategy for harried physicians: See patients in groups
- Fitch changes not-for-profit hospital outlook to negative
- Rapid-response teams have little effect on cardiac arrest deaths
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
- A new strategy for harried physicians: See patients in groups
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
Tennessee Urologist
StaffPointe, LLC - west , TN -
Oregon Family Practice
StaffPointe, LLC - east , OR -
North Carolina Psychiatrist
StaffPointe, LLC - coastal , NC -
Tennessee Neurologist
StaffPointe, LLC - near Chattanooga , TN -
Wisonsin-General Surgeon
Ohrmund Employment Group - Cedarburg, WI
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
Popular Topics
Senate questions NIH conflict-of-interest punishment
There have been a number of reports of federal government researchers violating ethical standards by accepting money from drug and device industry players, as of late. But according to the NIH, of the 44 people accused of improper conduct, only two have faced criminal punishment--Doctors Trey Sunderland and Thomas Walsh. The rest received nothing more than a slap on the wrist or were asked to retire. Despite their conduct, the researchers in question can't be fired because they are members of the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. At a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee yesterday, lawmakers questioned why the researchers hadn't been held accountable for their actions. It seems as though NIH officials recognize corruption among some of their employees but aren't necessarily proactive in removing them from the agency.
For more on the conflict-of-interest cases:
- check out this AP report
- read the report for the Los Angeles Times
Related Stories
- Psychiatrist solicited funds from drug companies
- Calif. lawmakers want more transplant oversight
- Study: Americans have many healthcare concerns
- CA bill would allow hospital fines
- Report: Medicaid study wasted $275M
- UnitedHealth stock sinks CA HMO regulator
- Cardiac surgeon faces conflict-of-interest challenge
- Senators want info on who paid doctors
- U.S. Senator questions partnership between cardiologists, medical devicemaker-backed group
- Cutting resident hours could cost big bucks
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





