FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FiercePharma

Senate may kill section of reform bill dubbed 'death panel' by critics

Tools
Tags
Social Security Act
Senate Bill
Reform Legislation
health reform
Death Care
Chuck Grassley
Advanced Directives

First, let's begin with the facts: There isn't and never was a "death panel" deciding who had the right to live or die included in any version of the health reform legislation coming out of Congress. However, to whatever extent there was any discussion of death and end-of-life care in the Senate version of the bill, it looks like that may be coming out of the legislation.

Until recently there has been a provision in the Social Security Act, inserted in 1990, which made sure that legal patient documents like advanced directives were a prominent parts of a patient's chart. The rule also required providers to educate staff and the community on advance directives. Staff members weren't paid for this educational process. The new bill, however, would pay them for their time.

Now a group of six Senators, including Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), has dropped these end-of-life provisions, arguing "they could be misinterpreted and implemented incorrectly." Death panel or no, I guess end-of-life counseling is out.

To learn more about this issue:
- read this Health Leaders Media piece

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceHealthcare Email Newsletter:
Comments (3) | Post a comment

Comments

If there never was a "death panel" provision in the proposed bill, why is the language being dropped? Can't drop something that wasn't there in the first place.

You are mistaken. The entire bill points to Ezekiel Emanuel's eugenics.

Folks aren't stupid. Were you at any of these town meetings?

No, I wasn't at those town meetings. I don't bother going to poorly-informed, lobbyist-staged, fear-driven hate fests, thank you very much.

Adjectives like "lobbyist staged" and "hate fest" indicate a clear liberal bias, and all information on this website (including those submitted by Anne in parentheses in the middle of an article) should be regarded for what they are: an opinion, plain and simple. I would not dismiss anyone's opinion, it is theirs and they are entitled to it, same as myself. Both sides think they have the answer, and without bi-partisanship there will be no solution anytime soon

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.