FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FiercePharma

Report: Five medical home recommendations for states

Tools
Tags
National Academy for State Health Policy
patient management
physician practices
physician groups
medical home

The "medical home" concept is all the rage these days, as many health leaders believe that it can cut costs and improve patient management. The question, however, is what model works best, as the idea is still in its infancy. Ever so slowly, health plans, research organizations and physician groups are weighing in.

This week, a state policy group has outlined five strategies states should consider when rolling out medical home programs. The National Academy for State Health Policy is suggesting that states should form partnerships with key players; create a clear definition of what a "medical home" is; align reimbursement with program goals; support physician practices; and measure results.

These recommendations are coming from 10 states with advanced medical home programs already in place, including Colorado, Idaho, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Oregon, Washington state, North Carolina and Rhode Island. It's not clear how these recommendations will help individual health plans or employer initiatives, but they're at least a start.

To get more information from the report:
- read this Modern Healthcare piece (reg. req.)

Related Articles:
Primary care groups issue medical home guidelines
NY health plans begin medical home effort
UnitedHealth tests medical home model in AZ
Health plans, MD groups plan 'medical home' project

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceHealthcare Email Newsletter:
Be the first to comment

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.