Most Popular Stories
- Federal bill would link Medicare hospital pay to quality
- Express Scripts clients being extorted, too
- Moody's says healthcare's vulnerable to economy's ills
- Obama healthcare plan a plus for hospitals, Moody's says
- Pay for no extra performance?
- Wiebking named new president of Provena; Acclaimed scientist preps first skin cancer vax trial;
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
Mississippi Family Practice Physician SLB1056bcx
StaffPointe, LLC - near Jackson, MS -
Washington Pediatrician
StaffPointe, LLC - near Seattle, WA -
California Director of Med/Surg
StaffPointe, LLC - San Francisco , CA -
New York Ophthalmologist
StaffPointe, LLC - Rochester, NY -
Texas Internal Medicine
StaffPointe, LLC - east , TX
Events
- World Healthcare Innovation & Technology Congress WHIT v.4.0
Dec 8-10 — Washington, DC - World Health Care Congress
April 14-16, 2009 — Washington, DC
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
Popular Topics
PET scan rates climbing dramatically
While positiron emission tomography (PET) scans weren't used much in clinical medicine 10 years ago, today they've become far more common. The number of PET scans performed has climbed dramatically as Medicare and private insurers have agreed to pay for them. Over the past five years, the number of PET scans performed has climbed 400 percent, with more than a million scans being performed per year, according to consulting firm IMV Limited. This surge tracks with increases in MRI and CT scan use, though the average PET scan costs about $2,500--more than triple the average cost for an MRI. Some critics attribute these increases to self-referral, which according to some research, is a factor in one-third to one-fifth of cases, depending on what type of scan is being performed.
To get a lot more background on this issue:
- read this Baltimore Sun piece
Related Article:
MD self-referrals for imaging slipping through. Report
Related Stories
- Medicare to expand 'no-pay' list
- Aetna limits anemia drug payments
- MN hospitals won't charge for major errors
- MN hospitals won't charge for major errors
- Letter: Pricing Transparency
- Law could hurt device makers
- White House's attempt to push Medicare expenses blocked
- Could drug co-pays rise for Medicare?
- Medicare PQRI needs serious improvement, AMA says
- CMS giving doctors 1.1 percent Medicare pay increase
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





