FEATURES >> YouTube | Top acute-care hospitals | Hospital Fires | Top BlackBerry Apps | Commentary
TOPICS >> Stimulus | Health Reform | CMS News | Finance | EMRs | Mobile Healthcare | Hospital Leadership Blog
More objections to Avandia suppressed by Glaxo
Comments
Interesting that the WSJ article reported a facet of this situation that Fierce Healthcare omits - perhaps deems unimportant?
The doctors involved also contacted the Food and Drug Administration but FDA was "unresponsive". In fact, the WSJ reports that Dr Money contacted FDA but "received only a form letter in response." The WSJ reporter requested FDA to comment for the article, but "FDA didn't respond".
So the headline is "suppression" by GlaxoSmithKline - but not failure to enforce regulation by FDA?
I wonder if the reason for this differential treatment is differential expectations. That is, physicians expect pharmaceutical companies to respond when their products are challenged. But physicians have far lesser expectations as to helpful or timely responses from government agencies.
In any event, I think the FDA's ho-hum attitude is at least as worrisome as Glaxo's aggressive response. Because. . . who will regulate our national insurance plan when we get it? Ho hum?





