Most Popular Stories
- UnitedHealth reveals details of option back-dating settlement
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- Social Security wants EMR access for disability determination
- Another attempt to halt Horizon BCBS of NJ's switch to for-profit
- Study: EMRs can cut paid malpractice settlements
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
- Healthcare on track to set record for mass layoffs
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- Study: EMRs can cut paid malpractice settlements
- Signs of trouble in the Motor City
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
Florida Otolaryngologist
StaffPointe, LLC - west , FL -
North Dakota Medical Oncologist
StaffPointe, LLC - northeast , ND -
Nevada Physician Assistant
StaffPointe, LLC - Las Vegas , NV -
Vermon Home Health RN
StaffPointe, LLC - south , VT -
Georgia Internal Medicine
StaffPointe, LLC - north , GA
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
Popular Topics
Medicare contractor changes slow payment for some doctors
In theory, the changes CMS is making to its network of reimbursement contractor firms were supposed to make things easier for doctors. The agency is in the process of replacing a ragtag group of fiscal intermediaries and Medicare carriers with "Medicare administrative contractors" (MACs) serving 15 jurisdictions across the country. Ultimately, by 2011, each of the physicians and hospitals in an area will have a single MAC that handles all Part A and Part B claims for their region.
So far, however, many doctors are complaining that the change have caused more confusion and payment delays, not less. By switching from familiar Medicare carriers to a new MAC with which they have no prior relationship, many doctors have found that it's more difficult to handle administrative issues when they arise, as they don't know who to contact or how to work the system. Meanwhile, some problems may stem from the fact that CMS is choosing MACs through a competitive bidding process. The MACs who were the low bidders may lack the money to offer good customer service, observers say.
On top of everything else, providers continue to struggle with the transition to the National Provider Identifier number and the switch to ICD-10 coding, issues with which can also delay Medicare payments. Stresses like these have forced some physicians and hospitals to add or expand credit lines to cover themselves as they wait for Medicare issues to work themselves out. All in all, a messy situation that is likely to get worse before it gets better.
To learn more about this issue:
- read this AMNews piece
Related Article:
NPI for Medicare claims now a must
Switch to ICD-10 should prove very costly
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





