FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FiercePharma

Health plans upset when employers help pay high deductibles

High-deductible health plans have been an extremely trendy idea of late, with the assumption being that consumers would use services more cautiously if they had to pay first-dollar coverage on their own. However, some employers have been muddying the waters a bit by buying high-deductible plans, then helping employees with the deductibles through their own payouts or added insurance coverage. The combined package may be as much as 40 percent cheaper than traditional coverage, while offering comparable benefits, according to one estimate for a 40-person business based in California.

Employers like this approach, which brokers have fostered in an effort to win their business. But lately, some health plans have raised a stink over this model, which they say can push costs up substantially by taking away employees' incentive to overuse services.  In fact, some California plans are so upset that they're asking employers to sign statements saying that they won't combine high-deductible plans with some types of self-insurance. Employers who won't sign could lose coverage. "Wrap-around schemes really run the risk of destroying lower-premium health products by driving up the price or making them go away completely," says Chris Ohman, president and CEO of the California Association of Health Plans.

To date, Blue Shield, Health Net, Kaiser Permanente and Anthem Blue Cross have sent letters to insurance brokers threatening them with termination of their contract and loss of commissions if they sell so-called "wrap-around" packages. I doubt they're the last.

To learn more about this trend:
- read this Sacramento Business Journal piece

Related Articles:
Study: CDHP use hits 40 percent among big firms
Study: High-deductible plans cut ED visits
Insurers vigorously defend CDHPs
Pediatrics group comes out against CDHPs

SHARE WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceHealthcare Email Newsletter:
Comments (3) | Post a comment

Comments

The brokers should sue the insurance companies for restraint of trade. I believe that they would win. The employers should tell the insurance companies to start paring down their profits or they will get the state legislature to allow them to band together and establish their own insurance company and leave the big boys without any premiums.

While I see some of the concern by the insurance company that people will not "shop" rates or be more mindful of their number of services, I am amazed at the fact that insurance companies are leaving out the fact that employers are still bearing the brunt of the high deductible and self insured amounts which equals money being paid to service providers and less payout on premiums from insurance companies.

Interesting take here, let me get this straight... high deductibles should be passed on to already taxed employees, employers are encouraged to save money, employers should not help thier employees to offset costs because employees should go to the doctor less and not promote preventative care in order to have a high cost claim? Great Idea! (joking here...)

Ridiculous!

Really, a terrible approach from insurance companies.

employers do not pay for employees insurance the employees pay for it out of their pay package

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.