FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FiercePharma

Groups share details on $2T cost-savings offer

Tools
Tags
Chronic Care
American Medical Association (AMA)
American Hospital Association (AHA)
AHA
Administrative Simplification

Still wondering how a collection of even the most powerful healthcare groups can shave $2 trillion off the growth in healthcare costs over the next decade? This week's letter from the American Hospital Association should clear things up a bit--or at least that's what it's designed to do. (And a good thing it is, given that the AHA was working hard to reduce expectations within a week of the original announcement.)

Backed by its posse of healthcare leaders, the AHA has sent a fat 28-page letter to the White House explaining what it plans to do to deliver on its claims. The group says it will begin its cost-savings program by cutting down on common surgical infections, then expand by helping its members improve care coordination, grow their use of health IT and boost overall efficiency.

The AHA is supported in its pledge by several other high-profile organizations, including America's Health Insurance Plans, the Service Employees International Union and the American Medical Association. Those groups identified three areas where they can provide savings: care utilization, chronic-care management and administrative simplification. They expect the biggest savings from improved chronic-care management, which they anticipate could cut costs by $850 billion.

To learn more about the cost-cutting effort:
- read this Modern Healthcare piece (reg. req.)

Related Articles:
Healthcare players offer plan to cut costs by $2 trillion
AHA backs off from $2T savings promise
Are industry's promises to cut $2T smoke and mirrors?

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceHealthcare Email Newsletter:
Comments (2) | Post a comment

Comments

I know a way that Hospitals can make a big dent in their $850 Billion cost reduction promises...

They can quit marking-up the price of implants by 500%. Instead of charging my self-insured clients $84,000 for an ICD or neurostimulator or knee replacement implant they buy from the manufacturer for $15,500, maybe they could just mark it up 50% to cover the cost of their "virtual inventory management expense."

This would be an immediate cost savings and a lot easier to control than infection rates.

I would love them to put me out of business!

Dr. Gordon Jones
Director
iMplant - an Implantable Device Benefit Management program
gordon.jones@awac.md

Get rid of the tax exempt status for hospitals at all levels. Let them compete for patients by improving quality and dropping prices just like we in private practice have been forced to do. Everything will fall in place. It is not a bad idea to open the entire hospital market to outside competitors including foreign hospitals.
If we don't do this insurance companies and their advisers will come up with outrageously stupid but very creative "cost saving" ideas like replacing doctors with nurse practitioners with pseudo doctorate degrees!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.