FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceHospital Impact   FiercePharmaFierceBiotechFierceSarbox
About | Sample | Privacy

Glaxo to report grants to U.S. healthcare groups

Tools
Tags
Chuck Grassley
Voluntary Disclosures
pharmaceutical companies
Massachusetts
GlaxoSmithKline
Financial Relationships
CME

Bowing to emerging trends favoring such disclosures, drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline has announced plans to publicly report the grants it provides to U.S. healthcare organizations. The report, which will be issued quarterly beginning in February 2009, will include grants provided to hospitals, teaching institutions, managed care organizations, professional associations, patient advocacy groups and CME companies. Details will include the recipient's name, a grant description and the amount provided. Notably absent, however, is information on the pharmaceutical firm's consulting agreements with doctors, a source of controversy in many discussions of pharma financial relationships.

The voluntary disclosures come at a time when both state and federal officials are pushing for such. Massachusetts, in fact, has just passed a law requiring drug companies and devicemakers to report payments of more than $50 made to medical providers. Meanwhile, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is sponsoring a federal bill that would establish similar rules.

To learn more about Glaxo's plans:
- read this Modern Healthcare piece (reg. req.)

Related Articles:
Study: Pharma disclosure laws not working
Pharma gift disclosure law wins Eli Lilly support
Drug companies plan to disclose grant funding
Senate investigates pharma influence on CME
Senate questions devicemaker payments to surgeons
Doctors weigh in on the pros and cons of accepting drug/device freebies

Comments

Just throw sunshine on everyone getting pharma money more than $100. Those who need that info will use it to draw their own conclusions. Shielding names of individuals helps no one. Institutions do not take bribes, individuals do. The same type of info should be displayed for each politician...each lobbyist. NONE of this money should be tax deductible, as the whole process is essentially deemed corrupting in nature

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 1 + 4?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.