Most Popular Stories
- Walgreens plans 100 more retail clinics by mid-2009
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
California Radialogy Tech Cath Lab
StaffPointe, LLC - Modesto , CA -
Florida Otolaryngologist
StaffPointe, LLC - west , FL -
Pennsylvania Physician Assistant
StaffPointe, LLC - southeast coast , PA -
Chief Privacy Officer, Americas Region
IMS Health Incorporated - Plymouth Meeting, PA -
Virginia Dialysis Registered Nurse
StaffPointe, LLC - north , VA
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
- Emerging markets series: Benchmarking key countries Brazil, Russia, India, China and Turkey
Popular Topics
Genetic discrimination bill progressing in Congress
After more than a decade of attempts, it looks like Congress might finally pass a bill that would block health insurers from denying coverage to otherwise healthy persons based on their genetic predisposition to come down with a particular disease. The bill, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, also would bar employers from using genetic info as part of hiring, firing, job placement or promotions. The House approved the bill last year, and the Senate is expected to vote on it this week. The Senate version, however, attempts to make the bill easier on insurers. The changes are a concession to Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), who has blocked the bill, arguing that it could impose unintended liability risks.
If this bill passes, it could have important implications for the future of personalized medicine. Right now, some researchers studying gene-specific effects of treatments are finding that some subjects won't participate due to fears that their data will be used in just the fashion proscribed by this legislation.
To learn more about the bill:
- read this Modern Healthcare piece (reg. req.)
Related Articles:
Genetic discrimination ban gains support
Fearing insurer backlash, patients avoid genetic tests
Genetic testing advances as insurers balk
Related Stories
- UnitedHealth's Ingenix faces mounting legal troubles
- CBO details savings from banning physician-owned hospitals
- SPOTLIGHT: Broader health coverage could reduce disparities, lawmakers say
- President says he'll veto bill stopping Medicare cuts
- Congress overrides Bush veto on Medicare bill, stalling cuts
- HIMMA debate hits Washington
- Health IT vote unlikely until after July 4 recess
- CA bill requires permission for cancellations
- Bill may narrow health plan coverage exclusions
- Congress passes bill banning genetic discrimination
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





