Most Popular Stories
- Walgreens plans 100 more retail clinics by mid-2009
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
California Director of Women's Health
StaffPointe, LLC - San Francisco , CA -
California Radialogy Tech Cath Lab
StaffPointe, LLC - Modesto , CA -
Texas Hospitalist
StaffPointe, LLC - south , TX -
Georgia Emergency Medicine
StaffPointe, LLC - southeast coast , GA -
California Urgent Care SLB1197tsNET
StaffPointe, LLC - south , CA
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
- Emerging markets series: Benchmarking key countries Brazil, Russia, India, China and Turkey
Popular Topics
FTC: Pharmas cut 14 deals to delay generic sales in '07
Makers of brand-name prescription drugs reached 14 agreements with makers of generic drugs to delay the generic drug makers entry into the market, according to a new report released by the Federal Trade Commission. The FTC says these deals, which it has dubbed 'pay-for-delay,' are harmful to consumers, but it hasn't been very successful in blocking them to date. The agency is on record as supporting legislation that would ban such deals, but such measures haven't made much progress on the Hill due to opposition from both brand-name and generic drug makers.
The 14 deals discussed were part of a total of 33 deals between brand-name and generic drug makers for FY 2007 reported to the agency (as required by 2003 Medicare legislation). In each of the 14 deals, the generic maker got some kind of compensation to delay the market entry of their generic product, and in 11 of the agreements, the brand-name drug maker agreed not to sell its own generic when its patents expired.
To learn more from the report, and get more context:
- read this Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report item
Related Articles:
FTC assails generic-delaying deals
FTC criticizes delay of generic competition
AstraZeneca, Par collaborate on authorized generic
US Senate to take on authorized generics
Related Stories
- Avandia gets black-box warning
- "Behind the counter" non prescription meds considered
- Merck agrees to $58M settlement on Vioxx ads
- Louisiana MDs win legal battle over patient record disclosure
- ME judge nixes law limiting prescribing data access
- FDA to further investigate anemia drug risks
- Vytorin, Avandia raise doubt on FDA approvals
- House bill would reverse Medicare anemia drug limits
- Senators plan bill countering pharma detailing tactics
- Who will pay for DTC pharma ad oversight?
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





