Most Popular Stories
- Hospitals lose reimbursement for 'unnecessary' ER visits
- Healthcare jobs will grow the fastest of all industries
- Online tools, social media ease clinical recruiting, research
- Hospital exec arrested in $116M Medicare scheme
- Patient satisfaction equal for physician, hospitalist care
- New Hospital Compare data shows disparity in blood infection rates
Featured Jobs
-
Epic Ambulatory Beacon Consultant
Meditology Services - NC -
Electronic Health Records Application Support Manager RN-New Year New Career
Avanti on behalf of Respected Health System - San Francisco, CA -
ICD-10 Revenue Cycle, Manager
Meditology Services - Atlanta, GA
Events
- Medicare Risk Adjusted Revenue and Plan Payments
April 12 - 13, 2012 — Baltimore, MD - ICD-10 Reality Check - Breakfast Panel at HiMSS 2012!
February 22, 2012 - AHIP's Institute 2012
June 20-22 — Salt Lake City, UT - CIO Healthcare Summit
March 11-14 — Scottsdale, AZ
Paid Research Reports
- Electronic health records: getting it right first time
- Cloud Computing Adoption In The APAC Life Sciences Industry
- Stakeholder Opinions: Ophthalmology - Leading brands under threat
- Genomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics in Diagnostics: Market landscape, innovative technologies and future outlook
- Healthcare Regulatory Update: The United Arab Emirates
- Point of Care Testing: Evaluating the return to evidence based medicine, novel technologies and the competitive landscape
Free Newsletter
FierceHealthcare is the leading source of healthcare management news for healthcare industry executives. Join 50,000+ healthcare industry insiders who get FierceHealthcare via daily email. Sign up today!
Popular Topics
Foxes in the henhouse: The limits of health plan MD ratings
![]()

Over the few days, Aetna and Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield agreed to restrictions on their physician ratings programs, following similar concessions by CIGNA late last month. And it's not just these companies under scrutiny. New York wants to see any and all of the state's health plans follow some common procedures when rating doctors, such as:
* Making sure that rankings are based on more than cost, and identifying to what extent cost is a factor
* Risk adjusting physician quality ratings
* Disclosing to consumers and physicians how the rankings are built, and giving both a chance to complain if the rankings seem inaccurate
These measures seem to have met with the approval of the AMA, which, not surprisingly, is happy to see the state keep the medical playing field level.
However, if I were a doctor, New York's actions wouldn't cheer me much. Even if such rules ripple out across the country and throughout the industry, you've still got "foxes in the henhouse" problem when it comes to health plan ratings.
Even assuming good faith efforts on their part, how can health plans possibly avoid tilting ratings very strongly toward lower costs? Yes, quality programs that ask the physicians to do something, like ensure that diabetics get eye exams, make sense to them sometimes. But overall, they have a far stronger incentive to limit care--and to reward physicians that do the same. (One possible exception to this is the program WellPoint has rolled out in cooperation with Zagat; this ratings plan seems to gather a great deal, if not all, of its ratings content from consumers.)
Honestly, I think many consumers will catch on over time, and take ratings from their friendly insurance company with a large grain of salt. In the mean time, however, expect to see a lot more regulatory activity in this area. - Anne
P.S. By the way, if you think third-party physician ratings companies like HealthGrades are building up steam now, just wait--that sector is poised to explode, for just the reasons I've outlined here. A firm mixing a large base of consumer ratings data (a la Zagat) with good professional data (like Health Grades) has nowhere to go but up. More on this in a future column.
Related Stories
- Another NY health insurer agrees to doctor-ranking rules
- Trend: Medical home funding sources grow
- Aetna, WellPoint refuse payment for serious errors
- UnitedHealth next to agree to NY rankings model
- Another two health plans agree to NY doctor-rankings system
- Aetna strikes doctor-ratings deal with NY
- Texas doctors fight back in MD ratings dispute
- Limited competition puts insurers in the driver seat
- Ingenix gets its comeuppance
- Study ranks Aetna, Cigna and Humana as fastest payers
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site Map
| Editors | List in Marketplace | Supplier in MarketplaceTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceEnergy | FierceSmartGrid | FierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceEMR | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceGovernment | FierceHomelandSecurity | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceEnterpriseCommunications | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2011 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |
