Most Popular Stories
- Walgreens plans 100 more retail clinics by mid-2009
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
New Hampshire Physical Therapist JK1021maNET
StaffPointe, LLC - northern , NH -
Washington Nurse Practitioner
StaffPointe, LLC - Tacoma/Olympia , WA -
Colorado NP or PA
StaffPointe, LLC - southeast , CO -
Virginia Nurse Mgr Emergency Dept
StaffPointe, LLC - Fredericksburg , VA -
Texas Hospitalist
StaffPointe, LLC - south , TX
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
- Emerging markets series: Benchmarking key countries Brazil, Russia, India, China and Turkey
Popular Topics
Foxes in the henhouse: The limits of health plan MD ratings
![]()

Over the few days, Aetna and Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield agreed to restrictions on their physician ratings programs, following similar concessions by CIGNA late last month. And it's not just these companies under scrutiny. New York wants to see any and all of the state's health plans follow some common procedures when rating doctors, such as:
* Making sure that rankings are based on more than cost, and identifying to what extent cost is a factor
* Risk adjusting physician quality ratings
* Disclosing to consumers and physicians how the rankings are built, and giving both a chance to complain if the rankings seem inaccurate
These measures seem to have met with the approval of the AMA, which, not surprisingly, is happy to see the state keep the medical playing field level.
However, if I were a doctor, New York's actions wouldn't cheer me much. Even if such rules ripple out across the country and throughout the industry, you've still got "foxes in the henhouse" problem when it comes to health plan ratings.
Even assuming good faith efforts on their part, how can health plans possibly avoid tilting ratings very strongly toward lower costs? Yes, quality programs that ask the physicians to do something, like ensure that diabetics get eye exams, make sense to them sometimes. But overall, they have a far stronger incentive to limit care--and to reward physicians that do the same. (One possible exception to this is the program WellPoint has rolled out in cooperation with Zagat; this ratings plan seems to gather a great deal, if not all, of its ratings content from consumers.)
Honestly, I think many consumers will catch on over time, and take ratings from their friendly insurance company with a large grain of salt. In the mean time, however, expect to see a lot more regulatory activity in this area. - Anne
P.S. By the way, if you think third-party physician ratings companies like HealthGrades are building up steam now, just wait--that sector is poised to explode, for just the reasons I've outlined here. A firm mixing a large base of consumer ratings data (a la Zagat) with good professional data (like Health Grades) has nowhere to go but up. More on this in a future column.
Related Stories
- Cigna pays for more retail clinic services
- CA law would ban balance billing for ED services
- Another NY health insurer agrees to doctor-ranking rules
- UnitedHealth next to agree to NY rankings model
- Aetna strikes doctor-ratings deal with NY
- Trend: Medical home funding sources grow
- AMA issues first health insurer report card
- OH plans, providers share pricing and quality information
- UnitedHealth's Ingenix faces mounting legal troubles
- CIGNA stops paying for its list of never events
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





