Most Popular Stories
- Walgreens plans 100 more retail clinics by mid-2009
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
California Director of Women's Health
StaffPointe, LLC - San Francisco , CA -
Wisonsin-General Surgeon
Ohrmund Employment Group - Cedarburg, WI -
Florida Noninvasive Cardiologist
StaffPointe, LLC - west , FL -
Arizona Nurse Practitioner
StaffPointe, LLC - southwest , AZ -
CA Nursing Direct. Medical/Telemetry
StaffPointe, LLC - San Francisco , CA
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
- Emerging markets series: Benchmarking key countries Brazil, Russia, India, China and Turkey
Popular Topics
FL bill would limit liability for ED docs
Some Florida legislators are trying to ease the shortage of on-call physicians by limiting their malpractice liability exposure. The bill would make healthcare workers "agents of the state" when they're treating emergencies, and its protection would extend to doctors, nurses, paramedics and hospitals. Malpractice awards in this situation would be capped at $200,000, unless the state legislature agreed to raise the limit in an individual case (which has about a snowball's chance in Florida of happening). Right now, without such protection, hospitals must pay some hefty dollars to doctors if they want them to be on call.
Not surprisingly, the bill is very popular with doctors and hospitals. Meanwhile, some critics say that it's not ideal because, for one thing, it won't bring doctors back in droves to ED work (given they have other reasons for not wanting to be on call). Worse, it could open the door to limiting liability in non-emergency cases, critics say. Still, the bill has sponsors in both the state Senate and House, so it actually could pass.
To learn more about the bill:
- read this St. Petersburg Times piece
Related Articles:
On-call payments for ED coverage challenged. Report
MA hospitals bow to on-call pay trend. Report
Trend: On-call shortage closing trauma departments. Report
SPOTLIGHT: Send in the "surgicalist." Report
Related Stories
- 'Hallway medicine' may be key to ED crowding
- HIV vaccine is not close, but efforts continue
- Common assumptions about uninsured ED users are false, says study
- Bush Administration re-funds community health centers
- FL sues Merck over Vioxx marketing
- Case study: TN ED diversion program works with clinics
- Mass. hospital struggles with patient violence
- Patient death raises questions on agency nurse use
- Study: Parents take kids to ER to avoid primary care physician
- Hospitals charge fee for non-emergency ED visits
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





