Most Popular Stories
- Walgreens plans 100 more retail clinics by mid-2009
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
California Director of Women's Health
StaffPointe, LLC - San Francisco , CA -
California Radialogy Tech Cath Lab
StaffPointe, LLC - Modesto , CA -
Texas Hospitalist
StaffPointe, LLC - south , TX -
Georgia Emergency Medicine
StaffPointe, LLC - southeast coast , GA -
California Urgent Care SLB1197tsNET
StaffPointe, LLC - south , CA
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
- Emerging markets series: Benchmarking key countries Brazil, Russia, India, China and Turkey
Popular Topics
Federal mental health parity measure faces roadblocks
Federal mental health parity legislation--designed to require health plans to cover mental illnesses on an equal basis with physical illnesses--has made meaningful progress of late. However, it's beginning to look as though differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill could stall negotiations and prevent the bill's passage this year. The House bill includes a broader definition of conditions health plans must cover, and would take effect on January 1, 2008, while the Senate bill is more narrowly drawn and would take effect one year after the bill is signed. Not only that, lawmakers estimate that the House bill could generate $4 billion in costs, something they'll have to cover if it moves forward. The House Ways and Means Committee may allocate this funding to offset cuts in physician Medicare reimbursement instead, observers say.
To find out more about the debate:
- read this Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report item
Related Articles:
Competing mental health parity bills duke it out. Report
Mental health coverage still not equal. Report
Mental health parity bill moves ahead. Report
Related Stories
- Western PA hospitals battle for Medicare hike
- PA works to shift patients to community care
- Senate may roll back 10 percent Medicare fee cut for MDs
- Blue Cross of California settles another policy cancellation suit
- AMA cites antitrust activity among insurers
- ALSO NOTED: GE Healthcare buys Biacore; Effort to block physician reimbursement cuts gains steam; and much more...
- Calif. aims to cap insurer profits
- Former members sue Calif. Blue Cross
- Federal bill would link Medicare hospital pay to quality
- Moody's says healthcare's vulnerable to economy's ills
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





