Most Popular Stories
- Walgreens plans 100 more retail clinics by mid-2009
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
California Radialogy Tech Cath Lab
StaffPointe, LLC - Modesto , CA -
Nevada Physician Assistant
StaffPointe, LLC - Las Vegas , NV -
Texas ER RN JK1020maNET
StaffPointe, LLC - central , TX -
Oregon Asst. Nurse Manager/Day Surgery
StaffPointe, LLC - Springfield , OR -
Nevada Psychiatrist
StaffPointe, LLC - Henderson , NV
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
- Emerging markets series: Benchmarking key countries Brazil, Russia, India, China and Turkey
Popular Topics
Editor's Corner
![]()
For years health service researchers have known that there's tremendous practice variation across the nation, that medical errors are ever-present and that optimal clinical processes are rarely followed. Fee-for-service medicine and the current Medicare case-rate payment system have been a primary cause of these problems, as they reward over-use and rework. An unwanted consequence of that is lower quality care. But how can we change the system?
Capitation and managed care in the 1990s didn't solve the problem. The latest candidate solution is pay-for-performance (P4P). P4P has made a good initial start in California, Massachusetts and elsewhere, and Medicare is very interested indeed in adopting it. But it remains a nascent movement that has many struggles to overcome before it becomes mainstream. P4P requires transparency, greater use of IT and the buy-in of the medical profession. Even then it's unclear as to whether P4P can actually save money while it improves care, partly because underutilization may be as common as overutilization. And it doesn't touch the problem of uninsurance and unequal access to care. - Matthew
Related Stories
- PA hospitals won't charge for 'never events'
- Big demand for pay-for-performance knowledge
- Hospitals in nearly half of states won't bill for never events
- KS health plans won't pay for 'never events'
- Boston hospital discloses wrong-side surgery
- MA Blue plan, state ban payment for medical errors
- NY Medicaid will stop paying for 'never events'
- Bundled payments to be tested by CMS
- CIGNA stops paying for its list of never events
- Medicare group issues hospital efficiency recommendations
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





