Most Popular Stories
- Walgreens plans 100 more retail clinics by mid-2009
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
California Hospital Pharmacist
StaffPointe, LLC - Central Valley , CA -
Texas Urgent Care Physician CEx1154
StaffPointe, LLC - near Sherman , TX -
California Director of Med/Surg
StaffPointe, LLC - San Francisco , CA -
Florida Pulmonologist/Critical Care
StaffPointe, LLC - near Tampa , FL -
Texas ER RN JK1020maNET
StaffPointe, LLC - central , TX
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
- Emerging markets series: Benchmarking key countries Brazil, Russia, India, China and Turkey
Popular Topics
Did pharma ask the FDA for off-label rule change?
In the past, pharmaceutical sales reps were allowed to distribute reprints of journal articles that supported drug uses which hadn't been given the FDA's official blessing. While the law that allowed this expired in 2006, many pharmaceutical companies are continuing to distribute such articles, even though their legal permission for doing so is gone.
Now, newly-proposed FDA rules (lobbied for strongly by pharmas) would protect those companies from prosecution and would allow the practice to continue. Unlike before, companies wouldn't have to get the agency's go-ahead on each article they distributed. What's more, the pharmas wouldn't have to restrict the reprints to off-label uses they'd already asked the FDA to approve. Sounds like an effective green-light for marketing off-label scripts!
All of this doesn't please Rep. Henry Waxman, who has strongly criticized the proposed rules as giving the pharmas way too much rope. Waxman, who wrote a strongly-worded memo to FDA chief Andrew von Eschenbach on the subject, is demanding that the FDA account for its actions.
To learn more about this issue:
- read the report from BusinessWeek
Related Articles:
Rep decries off-label marketing "loophole." Report
New warning for off-label Fentora. Report
Related Stories
- Studies show problems with four big-name drugs
- FDA says hospitals may still have recalled heparin
- CA bill would let pharmacies sell patient prescription data
- Boston ends Canadian drug import program, citing lack of interest
- Avandia gets black-box warning
- Study: Medicaid paid $198 million for unapproved drugs
- Statin drug probably not going OTC
- FDA to further investigate anemia drug risks
- Biotechs eager for FDA approval of biogeneric drugs
- FTC: Pharmas cut 14 deals to delay generic sales in '07
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





