Most Popular Stories
- Walgreens plans 100 more retail clinics by mid-2009
- Disruptive doctor behavior causes mistakes, intimidates workers
- AHA survey: Negative profit margins for hospitals
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interoperable systems
- Cleveland Clinic lists potential conflicts of interest online
- HHS: 60 percent of DME companies banned by Medicare may keep billing
Poll
Featured Jobs
-
Tennessee Occupational Medicine
StaffPointe, LLC - near Nashville , TN -
Illinois Cardiac Cath Lab Nurse
StaffPointe, LLC - Bloomington , IL -
Texas Dir. of Med/Surg
StaffPointe, LLC - east , TX -
Washington Nurse Practitioner
StaffPointe, LLC - Tacoma/Olympia , WA -
Wisconsin-Family Medicine
Ohrmund Employment Group - Cedarburg, WI
Events
- Avaya Patient Payment Recovery Webinar
Thursday, December 11, 2008 1-2pm
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies
- Emerging markets series: Benchmarking key countries Brazil, Russia, India, China and Turkey
Popular Topics
Decline in drug-coated stent use at top cardiac centers
In a page one story, The Wall Street Journal reports that some leading cardiac centers are cutting back "drastically" on their use of drug-coated stents. Cardiologists at Cedars-Sinai, Brigham and Women's and other top centers are shifting back to the bare metal variety based on concerns about the long-term risks of blood clots associated with drug-eluting models. Although statistics show the use of the newer models has not changed much overall, observers suspect the news could be early warning of changes ahead for the market for drugcoated stents, which is dominated by Boston Scientific and Johnson & Johnson. Shares of both companies fell in early trading this morning as investors reacted to the news.
- see this article from The Wall Street Journal (sub. req.)
PLUS: Forbes suggests that the impact on Boston Scientific's stent sales may be minor--the risk of clots is in line with the clinical trials data that got the stents approved in the first place. Article
Related Stories
- Cardiologists stand by stents
- FDA investigates Taxus stent
- SPOTLIGHT: Stent problems change cardiology tactics
- Insurers may cut stent payouts
- ALSO NOTED: Medicare HMO targets chronically ill; West Nile in Missouri; and much more...
- FDA report pains Boston Scientific
- Judge upholds Boston Scientific stent patent
- Questions raised on Guidant recall
- Guidant Merger Signifies Technological Shift
- SPOTLIGHT: Higher risk of clots in drug coated stents
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |





