Most Popular Stories
- BIDMC leadership ripped for inaction against Levy
- Cost of EMR ownership often much higher than expected
- Doctors and hospitals must play together or risk extinction
- Mayo tells more than 3,000 patients of possible Hepatitis C infection
- Unlicensed doc's multistate abortion operation under investigation
- Resident work hours need more regulation, advocacy groups argue
- Leading health plan CEO paychecks
- 15 Free Healthcare Apps for the iPhone
- Aetna is best health plan, UnitedHealthcare is worst, hospital execs say
- Nurses' jobs at risk for allegedly posting patient info on Facebook
- UnitedHealthcare contracts stop making no-warning fee changes
- WI nurses fired over cell photos of X-ray
Featured Jobs
-
Pharmacist opening
CompHealth - Metropolitan area, IA -
Director of Sales for Fast Growing CA Start-up
BAM Labs, Inc. - San Jose, CA
Events
Paid Research Reports
- Electronic health records: getting it right first time
- Cloud Computing Adoption In The APAC Life Sciences Industry
- Stakeholder Opinions: Ophthalmology - Leading brands under threat
- Genomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics in Diagnostics: Market landscape, innovative technologies and future outlook
- Healthcare Regulatory Update: The United Arab Emirates
- Point of Care Testing: Evaluating the return to evidence based medicine, novel technologies and the competitive landscape
Free Newsletter
FierceHealthcare is the leading source of healthcare management news for healthcare industry executives. Join 50,000+ healthcare industry insiders who get FierceHealthcare via daily email. Sign up today!
Popular Topics
- Medicare
- health plans
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
- Medicaid
- Insurance
- Electronic Medical Records (EMRs)
- health reform
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- healthcare system
- Chief Executive Officer
- healthcare reform
We never sell or give away your contact information. Our reader's trust comes first.
Cheating is the downside of targeted P4P, study says
As government and private payers look to pay-for-performance (P4P)--also called value-based purchasing--as the payment model that will push providers to produce higher-quality patient care at a lower cost, a study suggests one P4P approach might not always work as planned. Paying employees to perform better according to a target-based model can entice them to cheat, finds researchers with Ryerson University and the University of Guelph, both based in Canada.
"The dark side of behavior can be affected by pay-for-performance schemes," said Fei Song, co-author of the study and a business professor at Ryerson's Ted Rogers School of Management.
The researchers gave more than 200 students at the University of Guelph anagrams and asked them to create as many words as they could in one minute. Three groups of students completed this task using different pay-for-performance schemes.
Those who followed a linear piece-rate system received a bonus for each unit they produced. Under a tournament-based bonus system, payment was tied to a person's performance compared to others'. Under a target-based model, people would not be compensated unless they achieved pre-set goals for performance.
The researchers found that students cheated significantly more when the target-based compensation system was used compared to the other two incentive plans. What's more, the closer the participant's actual performance was to the target, the more often they cheated.
"We speculate that people feel much worse if they miss a target by only a small margin rather than a large one," Song said.
To learn more:
- see the study abstract in the Berkeley Electronic Press Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy
- check out this related article from Ryerson University's Ted Rogers School of Management
Related Stories:
Study: P4P works with proper incentives
P4P: Two studies raise issues re: discrimination, disparity in care
Trend: Number of P4P programs increasing rapidly
Insurance group pushes for P4P in reform
Study: Physicians say P4P would harm care
Related Stories
- Pay for no extra performance?
- PricewaterhouseCoopers predicts major health system changes in 2009
- CMS shares approaches for transforming FFS Medicare
- Congress considers bundled payments for Medicare
- Pay-for-performance programs becoming more established
- Study: P4P works with proper incentives
- Drugmakers offer performance-based pricing
- Federal pay-for-performance initiatives could mean more financial heartache for poor hospitals
- Study: Safety net hospitals improve care in P4P demo project
- SPOTLIGHT: Pay-for-performance doesn't help U.K. diabetics
Comments
Paying employees to perform better according to a target-based model can entice them to cheat, finds researchers with Ryerson University and the University of Guelph, both based in Canada.
Substitute "hospitals" for employees. This is what is happening and will happen when hospitals employ a majority of physicians.
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site Map | List in Marketplace | Supplier in MarketplaceTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2010 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |

