Businesses say: "no pay" for major mistakes
Providers are certainly mortified when they make a "never" mistake--such as performing surgery on the wrong limb--but even then, few spontaneously offer to waive the costs of the procedure. These days, however, some large employers are arguing that providers should do just that. The Leapfrog Group, which represents giant employers like Boeing and General Electric, is now asking providers to cancel the bill and issue an apology whenever any of the 28 adverse events takes place. Leapfrog's initiative is supported by The Midwest Business Group on Health, which represents about 80 Chicago-area employers. The events targeted by Leapfrog range from the extreme--such as mixing up donors for an artificial insemination--to more-common problems such as injuring a patient with contaminated tools or drugs.
Observers predict that most hospitals will agree to this proposal, but will still end up working out many problems on an individual basis. In the future, meanwhile, they may come under pressure from insurers as well, as health plans are gradually beginning to rule out payment for never events. One health plan, Minneapolis based HealthPartners, not only requires its network hospitals to report errors to state governments but also won't let hospitals bill patients for these procedures. Eventually, as this trend evolves, hospitals and clinicians may end up eating the fee when more-minor errors occur.
For more background on the issue:
- read this article from the Chicago Tribune (reg. req.)
- read The Leapfrog Group's press release on this topic
- get Rand Health's ideas on how to build a national never event database
Related Article: CMS's McClellan tells Congress that Medicare shouldn't reimburse for never events. Article
Comments
I can understand that the cost of fixing the mistake is borne by the hospital, but to say "No Pay" is too draconian.
If there is a problem with my car (recall), do I want it fixed for free (yes). But do I want the price I paid for the car reimbursed?
Anon 1 - spurious argument! Why should we pay for totally botched surgery or car repairs! We're not talking about a minor hospital infection (which COULD be prevented) - we are talking really egregious stuff. Like getting your car back without a windshield when you tried to buy a new tire!
Post new comment
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Adverse events with drug-eluting stents demand a new safety standard
- Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Public Healthcare Policy
- The Cardiovascular Disorders Market Outlook to 2012
- 2008 Trends to Watch: Pharmaceutical Technology
- Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement: Strategies for market access across the US, Europe, Japan and other key geographies




