FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FiercePharma

Bush focuses on healthcare in speech

Tools
Tags
hospital industry
healthcare coverage
proposals
President Bush

President Bush joined the national debate on universal healthcare last night with two proposals outlined in his State of the Union speech. In a previous radio address, Bush had revealed his plan to control healthcare costs by tax breaks to help low-income people buy insurance and a tax boost for employees whose health coverage costs more than average. Last night he also announced a policy to support the universal health efforts of several states. The so-called "Affordable Choices Initiative" would divert some federal money now going to hospitals and other facilities and give the money to the states. The plan would give governors more legal leeway in using Medicaid dollars if they develop smart healthcare coverage expansion strategies, moving $40 billion in disproportionate share payments away from hospitals.

Many health industry wonks are happy to see the President turn the national focus to healthcare, but Bush's plan has already drawn criticism from a number of groups. Democrats and other groups are attacking the tax deduction, which would lower taxes for 100 million citizens but raise taxes on about 30 million Americans with more expensive health plans. They also fear that employers will be less likely to provide health coverage for employees due to the tax change. And hospitals are protesting the Affordable Choices Initiative, suggesting that it could undermine their already fragile relationship with the Medicaid program and possibly push some poorer hospitals further underwater financially. Finally, the State of the Union address was important for what it didn't mention. Though the President mentioned the future financial problems Medicare and Social Security face, he didn't offer any proposal on how to deal with the problems.

For more information on the initiative:
- check out this article from the New York Times
- read the White House press release on its health proposals
- find out more about the hospital industry's lobbying efforts to block DSH program changes

Related Articles:
Bush to address health coverage. Report
Universal health model emerges. Report
Mass. objects to $380 minimum coverage price. Report

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceHealthcare Email Newsletter:
Be the first to comment

Comments

I am sorry, but objecting to a $380 dollar insurance cost is ludicrous. While I realize everyone should have the right to healtcare, to offer it free to some only penalizes those who already pay for it more heavily, because those who already pay have to pay more for those who receive it for free. While Bush wanting to re-direct $40B is insane, since we all know how easily any state can mishandle money, the unfair payout of funds to hospitals will only continue if the system is not changed in some way.

I must disagree with the Presidents "Affordable Choices Initiative" and any proposed tax increases. No one can argue that Medicade and healthcare costs must be controlled. The state of our healthcare industry is at an all time low. Many hospitals and institutions are going out of business because of the misguided mistakes of government officials. I do not think that it would be a good idea to adopt a hard-line, radical approach to this by raising taxes and diverting money away from the hospitals and clinics that provide healthcare services. This strategy would put Billions $$$ into the deep pockets of state bureaucrats who care more about their own political agendas than the quality of healthcare for all Americans. This would be a mockery. Why not pass the cost on to the pharmaceutical companies?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.