FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FiercePharma

Bush administration finalizes stronger provider 'conscience' rule

Tools
Tags
discrimination
Public Health Service Act
conscience rights
Healthcare Employers
Government Funding
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Bush Administration
Barack Obama
Abortions

Amidst considerable controversy, the Bush administration has gone ahead and finalized a rule that gives health workers greater latitude to participate in care they find morally objectionable, including abortions. On the other hand, it appears that the rule may meet a hasty death when incoming president Barack Obama takes office.

The new regulations require healthcare employers to certify in writing that they're complying with several federal laws protecting the conscience rights of healthcare workers. These include a new section that was added to the Public Health Service Act in 1996 prohibiting government organizations from discriminating against healthcare providers that refused to perform abortions and related activities.

What gives the new rules a kick is that they also threaten providers with loss of government funding, plus legal action to recoup government dollars already paid out to them, if they violate these provisions.

That being said, president-elect Obama has publicly criticized these rules, and it seems likely he'll see to it that they go away when he's in office, political observers say.

To learn more about the future of the new regulation:
- read this Wall Street Journal Health Blog item

Related Articles:
HHS supports stronger 'provider conscience' options
MDs might not mention treatments they oppose
Born-again medicine

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceHealthcare Email Newsletter:
Comments (1) | Post a comment

Comments

The rule only says that people cannot be forced to violate their consciences and morals. It certainly leaves the door open for others to perform tasks and uphold their own version of morals in opposition.

Both sides can win. What's wrong with that?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.