Sutter Health asks court to dismiss California AG's antitrust lawsuit 

Lawsuit document
Sutter Health is calling for the state AG's case against it to be dismissed. (Getty/eccolo74)

Sutter Health is calling on a San Francisco court to throw out the state's suit against it alleging anticompetitive practices, saying the case could lead to regulations that would significantly hurt the system's bottom line. 

In documents (PDF) filed Monday in San Francisco Superior Court, Sutter says that the case would force the courts to get involved in regulatory issues that are already overseen by the executive and judicial branches. It argued that courts are "ill-suited" to manage such issues. 

Furthermore, they said Attorney General Xavier Becerra's case could lead to additional regulations that would "inflict serious harm on this highly complex industry" and could ultimately hurt patients.


9 Tips for Implementing the Best Mobile App Strategy

The member mobile app is a powerful tool for payers and members. It can help improve health outcomes, reduce operational costs, and drive self-service — anytime, anywhere. In this new eBook, learn tips and tricks to implementing the best mobile app strategy now.

"The relief sought by the Attorney General in this Cartwright Act suit against Sutter Health is unprecedented in scope and threatens to upend Sutter's business model and hobble Sutter's efforts to innovate," according to the filing. 

RELATED: Healthcare price growth at a 6-year high as consumers lose confidence in their ability to pay 

Becerra filed suit against Sutter in late March, saying that the health system—Northern California's largest—has engaged in anticompetitive practices that drove up costs in the region. The results of the case could make waves for hospitals across the country. 

"Sutter Health is throwing its weight around in the healthcare market, and engaging in illegal and anticompetitive pricing that hurts California families," Becerra said.  Becerra said Sutter was able to increase prices in several ways, such as forcing payers to negotiate with it in an "all-or-nothing" systemwide manner and limiting price transparency. 

Sutter disputed Becerra's claims, saying in a statement updated May 11 that there is healthy competition in the northern part of the state and that the lawsuit could "disrupt healthcare delivery across our communities and harm patient choice." 

"Unfortunately, the California Attorney General's lawsuit gets the facts wrong, and mischaracterizes how Sutter Health serves patients and communities as a not-for-profit organization in the competitive Northern California healthcare environment," the system said. 

RELATED: In a new pharmacy initiative, Sutter Health reimagines its approach to real-time analytics 

In the filing, Sutter also said that the AG's request that it use separate negotiating teams for each provider to interact with payers could "cripple" the health system's efforts to work with insurers to build value-based payment systems. 

The change would hinder Sutter's negotiating power, as it would favor insurance companies, the system said. 

Bercerra said the state's lawsuit against the health system follows a history of anticompetitive behavior by Sutter which has drawn lawsuits from employers and consumers over its prices. The system came under fire for intentionally destroying 192 boxes of evidence in 2015, which it said was a mistake.  

Suggested Articles

The COVID-19 pandemic abruptly changed the healthcare industry and healthcare providers had to adapt quickly to an unprecedented landscape.

CaaS is a library of up-to-date, accurate health information ready to do your bidding. Learn what structured content can do for you.

Providers are getting an additional five months to comply with new regulations aimed at improving data sharing.