Invest in primary care to cut costs, reduce overuse

moneyroll
More investment in primary care could have substantial benefits for the healthcare system.

One solution to improve the U.S. healthcare system is more investment in primary care, and one state that has enhanced primary care is now seeing the benefits.

Increased access to and use of primary care can reduce readmissions and help cut costs, so embracing it is crucial for improved outcomes, according to Russell S. Phillips, M.D., director of the Center for Primary Care and the William Applebaum Professor of Medicine and Professor of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School, in a blog post from Health Affairs. Despite that, just a fraction of spending in the system is on primary care. 

Innovation Awards

Submit your nominations for the FierceHealthcare Innovation Awards

The FierceHealthcare Innovation Awards showcases outstanding innovation that is driving improvements and transforming the industry. Our expert panel of judges will determine which companies demonstrate innovative solutions that have the greatest potential to save money, engage patients, or revolutionize the industry. Deadline for submissions is this Friday, October 18th.

Related: Invest in primary care, doctors tell legislators

Rhode Island has made significant investments at the state level to boost its primary care providers, according to the post. Between 2010 and 2015, the state’s initiative has increased spending on primary care from 5% to 10.7%, which includes supplemental per-member-per-month payments for infrastructure and on quality metrics.

As part of this initiative to put more focus on primary care, there has also been a significant increase in the number of patient-centered medical homes available, and 95% of practices have achieved that status, Phillips wrote.

Related: How one practice transformed into a patient-centered medical home

PCMHs have been shown to reduce costs and overuse of healthcare services, and thus far the Rhode Island model has seen those same results. A survey of 100,000 members found that for practices that underwent the transformation, costs decreased by $30 million, fueled by a 16% drop in readmissions and a 30% drop in admissions. That represents a 250% return on investment, according to the blog.

The blog notes, though, that Rhode Island’s model was built within a fee-for-service structure. Future looks at how to invest more heavily in primary care should factor the transition from volume to value into the equation.

Suggested Articles

In a letter, 111 physician organizations weighed in on surprise billing, urging Congress not to turn more power over to health insurers.

Medicaid enrollment was down by nearly 2% this year and is expected to be flat in 2020, according to a recent survey of states.

As members of Congress wrangle over the best way to stop surprise medical bills, one senator predicts Washington will pass a new law soon.