High-risk practices more likely to receive penalty under Medicare value-based payment program

Practices with more high-risk patients may be more likely to see penalties under value-based payment systems, a new study suggests.

Physician practices that take on more medically and socially high-risk patients than others are more likely to pay a financial price under a Medicare payment program.

Despite safeguards such as risk adjustment, practices that served a disproportionate share of those high-risk patients in the first year of the Medicare Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Program were more likely to receive a penalty when compared with other practices, a study published in JAMA found.

Researchers looked at program payments made in 2015 to 899 large practices caring for more than 5.1 million Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who were treated in 2013. Practices that served more socially high-risk patients had lower quality and lower costs. Practices serving more medically high-risk patients had lower quality and higher costs.

RELATED: 3 traits of good value-based payment programs

Both were patterns associated with fewer bonuses and more penalties for high-risk practices based on performance in the program, the study found. High-risk practices served patient populations that were generally younger and more often of ethnic minority, dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid and disabled, the study found.

Under the program, a precursor to the Medicare Quality Payment Program that began this year under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), physician practices receive penalties or bonuses that range from -1% to 10% of Medicare payments in 2015 based on quality and costs of care.

RELATED: CMS releases updated proposed rule for MACRA, eases burden on small and rural practices

The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) being implemented under MACRA combines the Physician Quality Reporting System and the Value-Based Payment Modifier.

The findings suggest that as value-based payment programs continue to increase in size and scope, practices that serve high-risk patients may be at particular risk of getting hit with financial penalties, the study concluded.

One question that arises in the shift from volume-based to value-based payment is whether doctors will "cherry pick" or “lemon drop” patients, dismissing those with complex needs who use a lot of resources. However, a study earlier this year suggested that isn’t the case; doctors didn’t dismiss patients and limit their practice to those for whom they can readily demonstrate value to maximize revenue in a value-based payment system.

Suggested Articles

We take a look back at health insurers' financial performance, including soaring profits, in Q2.

Employment growth in the healthcare industry cooled off in July as the sector added fewer jobs than in June as COVID-19 continues to spread.

A new study found that more than half of doctors don't believe drug-resistant superbugs are a major concern for their practice.