Supreme Court remands contraception coverage case to lower courts

The Supreme Court has declined to rule in the case Zubik v. Burwell, instead leaving it up to lower courts to hash out a compromise over the Affordable Care Act's contraception coverage requirements for religiously affiliated employers.

The second major challenge to the ACA's birth control coverage mandate had argued that the government's exemption to the mandate--which defers the cost of birth control benefits to the organization's insurance company--still violates employers' religious freedom.

In a unanimous opinion issued Monday, the justices remanded the case to the respective United States Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fifth, Tenth and District of Columbia Circuits. "The Court expresses no view on the merits of the cases. In particular, the Court does not decide whether petitioners' religious exercise has been substantially burdened, whether the government has a compelling interest or whether the current regulations are the least restrictive means of serving that interest," the opinion states.

The Court had sought some form of compromise in the case following opening arguments in March, during which the justices--which number only eight due to Antonin Scalia's death--appeared headed toward a deadlock.

However, after the Court directed each side to submit briefs outlining a potential compromise, it became clear that neither was close to reaching a consensus. The petitioners suggested a scenario in which insurance companies could create separate plans to cover birth control, but the government deemed that proposal "unworkable."

Given the complexity of the case, the Court's opinion also emphasizes that the parties should be given sufficient time to arrive at an approach that protects the petitioners' religious exercise while at the same time ensuring that women covered by petitioners' health plans "receive full and equal health coverage, including contraceptive coverage."

To learn more:
- here's the Court's opinion

Related Articles:
Government, religious employers no closer to contraception consensus
Supreme Court seeks alternative in contraception case
Opening arguments in ACA contraception case hint at deadlock
Supreme Court strikes down birth control mandate for closely held companies
Supreme Court contraception case hinges on decades-old religious freedom law

Free Webinar

Take Control of Your Escalating Claim Costs through a Comprehensive Pre-payment Hospital Bill Review Solution

Today managing high dollar claim spend is more important than ever for Health Plans, TPAs, Employers, and Reinsurers, and can pose significant financial risks. How can these costs be managed without being a constant financial drain on your company resources? Our combination of the right people and the right technology provides an approach that ensures claims are paid right, the first time. Register Now!

Suggested Articles

With the distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine looming, companies in the pharmaceutical supply chain are working overtime to plan for all contingencies.

The pandemic is transforming the way the healthcare industry handles payments. Here are key takeaways on the benefits of automated payments.

After hitting the high-water mark in the third quarter, global healthcare funding is projected to slow down in the final quarter of 2020.