Experts call for legislative fix for ACA exchanges, 'Accountable Care 2.0'

capitol building above trees

Editor's Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly attributed several quotes. The quotes are from Peter Orszag and Richard Gilfillan.

Going forward, health payers and policymakers must rethink their approaches to accountable care and the Affordable Care Act exchanges, experts said during a panel discussion Monday.

Peter Orzag

Experts from both the public and private sectors gathered to discuss a series of papers from the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) as part of a symposium.

Digital Transformation

Unlock the Digital Front Door with an App

The Member Mobile App is the smarter and better way to engage members anytime and anywhere. Members can find the right doctors, receive alerts, track spending, use telehealth, and more — all within a guided, intuitive, and seamless experience. Built exclusively for payers, it is ready to install and launch in a few months. Request a consult on how to enable the digital front door with the Mobile App, today.
When asked what advice he would give the next president of the United States on healthcare, Peter Orszag, vice chairman of investment banking and managing director at Lazard, called for legislative intervention to stabilize the ACA exchanges. The exchanges took a major hit in August when Aetna announced it would pull out of 11 states, becoming just the latest large insurer to reduce its marketplace participation. 

To save the exchanges, Orszag said, policymakers must pass such fixes as extending the reinsurance and risk corridor programs, which are set to end after this year, as well as dialing back individual coverage for off-exchange plan members.

Another possibility policymakers should consider, Orszag said, would be a personalized, clinically-driven risk score for patients that operates like a credit rating.

Richard Gilfillan, M.D., President and CEO of Trinity Health, also advocated for what he called “Accountable Care 2.0”--a reworking of the accountable care structure that makes it more enticing to providers.

“The difference between now and the 90s is that providers feel good about the accountable care work that’s going on. They want to go there, but the deal’s so bad that many don’t," he said.

He discouraged policymakers from trying to incentivize accountable care by making it mandatory, saying voluntary arrangements would produce better results.

“There’s still a chance to engage our provider system in willingly providing Triple Aim care,” he said, as long as policymakers “put the full force of the federal government behind alternative payment models.”

Suggested Articles

Vaccination rates for Medicaid and CHIP declined precipitously as well as rates for health screenings for children due to COVID-19, CMS reports.

Anthem and Humana quickly had to pivot to handle food insecurity issues among its Medicare Advantage members at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

There is a potential legal skirmish brewing two of the largest telehealth companies over patent claims.