4 ways state innovation waivers can't deliver on promise of reform

Though state innovation waivers allowed under Section 1332 of the Affordable Care Act look like a promising way for states to dismantle some components of the ACA, actually doing so is not as simple as it seems, according to a Health Affairs Blog post.

Such ACA alternative plans are generally required to provide coverage that's at least as comprehensive and affordable as those under the health law, cover a comparable number of residents and not add to the federal deficit, the post noted. Guidance released in December from the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of the Treasury further says those departments will assess how those proposals affect vulnerable residents, as FierceHealthPayer previously reported.

As a result, several proposals that seemed to have promise have little chance of succeeding, according to the post. Those include:

Free Daily Newsletter

Like this story? Subscribe to FierceHealthcare!

The healthcare sector remains in flux as policy, regulation, technology and trends shape the market. FierceHealthcare subscribers rely on our suite of newsletters as their must-read source for the latest news, analysis and data impacting their world. Sign up today to get healthcare news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
  • Eliminating either the employer mandate or the individual mandate, both of which would reduce federal revenues.
  • Waiving essential health benefits, which would require states to prove that won't reduce the number of residents with coverage that is at least as comprehensive.
  • Allowing subsidies outside the ACA exchange, which would increase federal spending on premium tax credits and cost-sharing reduction subsidies.
  • Expanding subsidies to people with access to employer-sponsored insurance, which, again, would increase federal costs.

"Without flexibility in cost-sharing, coverage or enrollment, it is difficult to see what room for meaningful change remains outside of the kind of single-payer system that attracted Vermont and Colorado to Section 1332," according to the post, "unless states are willing to take on higher risks and increased costs in order to obtain a waiver."

To learn more:
- here's the post

Suggested Articles

An estimated 73 million Americans with commercial health insurance face limited choices, according to a new American Medical Association study.

Absent adequate reimbursement for time spent on complex patient care, specialists are finding it harder to sustain their practices.

Tennessee released its proposal to CMS to become the first state to convert federal Medicaid funding into a block grant.