National EMR adoption could cost $150B

How much will it cost to roll out and fully implement EMRs in all U.S. physicians' offices and hospitals? A whopping $150 billion spread over the next eight years, according to one health economics professor. The professor, Robert Miller, of the University of California, San Francisco, actually considers the sum to be "manageable," given that it accounts for less than 1 percent increase per year in total U.S. healthcare spending.

Miller, who made his remarks at an Institute of Medicine workshop on the subject held last week, projects that hospitals are likely to spend $35 billion to buy and expand EMR systems, plus $55 billion on operating costs. In his view, large hospitals with the most beds are likely to be able to afford EMRs, but public and smaller hospitals--as well as troubled for-profits--may fall behind in the EMR arms race.

Meanwhile, the 96-odd percent of medical practices without EMRs would need to lay out about $15 billion in capital to acquire them, plus $24 billion to operate them over the next eight years, Miller says. Then there's $20 billion that should be spent for EMRs in nursing homes and other medical professional settings, Miller suggests.

To learn more about Miller's conclusions:
- read this Government Health IT piece

Related Articles:
CBO says EMRs won't save as much as hoped
California MDs lead in EMR adoption
CMS to offer EMR adoption incentives
The hidden side of EMR adoption

Suggested Articles

UnitedHealth Group's Optum business acquired startup NaviHealth, a company that provides post-acute care management services.

Google's latest initiative points to the role it wants to play as part of the COVID-19 response and, more broadly, in healthcare.

Erica Galvez of Manifest MedEx hopes more healthcare leaders recognize that they already have the tools to respond to the call for remote care.