HIMSS ICD-10 test finds there's plenty of room for improvement

Coders participating in an ICD-10 test by the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) and the Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI) achieved an average accuracy rate of just 63 percent, according to a new report.

The National Pilot Program was designed to be a collaborative, industrywide effort to help those transitioning to the new coding system by sharing best practices and lessons learned. Though initially meant to be an end-to-end test, time constraints meant initiating a separate test of billing.

The pilot involved real, de-identified medical records coded against an answer key developed by certified trainers from various organizations. Providers, clearinghouses and health plans could then test their coding against the answer key.

Testing by the North Carolina Healthcare Information and Communications Alliance (NCHICA) served as a basis for the national pilot. NCHICA Executive Director Holt Anderson told the Medical Group Management Association at a conference earlier this month that results from its efforts were "scary."

The national testing was done in 12 waves, with low scores often associated with "unspecified" diagnoses, such as "chest pain, unspecified" or "congestive heart failure, unspecified."  Some variation in coding was attributed to organizational variations in reporting minor procedures and codes for history and risk factors. Some hospitals, for instance, might code every indication, such as history of hemorrhoids, for example, while others include only those relevant to the case at hand, the report says.

Among the findings:

  • Occasionally coders coded the diagnosis but forgot to code the procedures.
  • Some coders became too dependent on the software instead of determining when they needed to override it.
  • Testing organizations with fully implemented EHRs had difficulty coding medical records that were hand-written.

Among the recommendations:

  • Move away from silo-based testing software and approaches that inhibit collaboration across the healthcare continuum.
  • Assign all codes from a native ICD-10 perspective rather than converting from ICD-9.
  • Anticipate coding discrepancies; participate in a group that allows for a national discussion regarding discrepancies.

The paper concludes by saying that all affected entities should be testing now, and should allow as much time as possible for testing to protect their bottom lines.

By many accounts, the ICD-10 plans for many healthcare organizations are still in their infancy, despite the many warnings that testing remains crucial.

"Institutional survival" will be healthcare CIOs' focus for 2014, with ICD-10 readiness consuming a majority of IT resources in the new year, John Halamka, CIO at Boston's Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, says on his Life As A Healthcare CIO blog.

To learn more:
- find the report (.pdf)


Driving Engagement in an Evolving Healthcare Ecosystem

Deep-dive into evolving consumer expectations in healthcare today and how leading providers are shaping their infrastructure to connect with patients through virtual care.

Suggested Articles

Telehealth is on the rise. The challenge for providers, however, is to convince patients who may still be skeptical or uncertain.

Starting in 2021, the ONC will launch an initiative called Project [email protected] to create an industrywide healthcare specification for representing addresses.

In turn, UPMC will also become a strategic investor in CarepathRx, officials said.